<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
Robin Johnson wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:Pine.LNX.4.43.0207061943030.32070-100000@fermi.orbis-terrarum.net">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Marc Delisle wrote:<br></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I suggest a -rc3 on July the 14th, and 2.3.0 on July the 28th.<br><br>IMHO the goal is not to fix all bugs. There are some bugs that would<br>need major modifications of the code (for example Relation and order<br>by), and I can live with them in 2.3.0. It's not time for large<br>modifications of the code.<br></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->I think you are wrong there Marc. YMMV but with the the number of people<br>that want to use the relation code, I think it should be fixed.</pre>
</blockquote>
IMHO, bug 574852 is not a show-stopper. However if you think your parser
is ready to go, <br>
let's put it at work on this bug.<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:Pine.LNX.4.43.0207061943030.32070-100000@fermi.orbis-terrarum.net">
<pre wrap=""><br><br>I haven't done any tracing on those two bugs, but could somebody please<br>tell me if the problem can be solved by my parser being able identify the<br>correct tables and fields used in the query?</pre>
</blockquote>
About 574852, in the tracker I said that it is a parsing problem, but would
wait after 2.3.0 because<br>
the new parser was not merged.<br>
<br>
To which second bug are you referring to?<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:Pine.LNX.4.43.0207061943030.32070-100000@fermi.orbis-terrarum.net">
<pre wrap=""><br><br>With my parser at the moment, the actual parser code I would call ready to<br>go (see about the lone bug at the bottom of the email), but the<br>pretty-printer/formatter still needs work.<br><br></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>