<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Okay ...<br>
<br>
... if I should use a PHP-Framework, I'm thinking we should use the
newest<br>
Symfony and if released I would prefer use Symfony Reloaded 2.0<br>
(<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://symfony-reloaded.org/">http://symfony-reloaded.org/</a>). The final release of Reloaded 2.0 is
planned for<br>
<strong>late 2010</strong> and will only support <strong>PHP 5.3.2</strong>.
This mean I (and others to) would<br>
have more time for integrate Symfony in PMA.<br>
<br>
Should we open a separated development folder for this project?<br>
<br>
Symfony has a full support for jQuery, so I think, it would be a good
solution, to<br>
use it as our new JS-Framework?<br>
<br>
Is it possible to make discussion about comments for html-output? It
would be<br>
helpfull for me, to search in whole PMA-Scripts for it, and then
sperate PHP from<br>
HTML. Many Thanks ;)<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
Michael<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 08.03.2010 17:14, schrieb Michal Čihař:
<blockquote cite="mid:20100308171423.40f41b17@rincewind.suse.cz"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi
Dne Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:07:27 +0100
Michael Keck <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:sfnet@michaelkeck.de"><sfnet@michaelkeck.de></a> napsal(a):
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Yes, why not?
But it would really help me, if developers leave comments, what is for
output.
My goal is to seperate PMA-function from html (-output). This will
support more
flexibility for layout and theming and perhabs to invide developers to make
only php code and others the html-output.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
This is definitely needed for long time, thanks for volunteering!
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">But which should I use?
I've found follow template engines, and I want to get little feeadback
which would be right and good for us:
* TWIG
Link: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.twig-project.org/">http://www.twig-project.org/</a>)
Info: it's made from the same peoples wich made Symfony.
What I say: It's really fast (see
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://fabien.potencier.org/article/34/templating-engines-in-php">http://fabien.potencier.org/article/34/templating-engines-in-php</a>)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I don't know anything about most of them, but the syntax of Twig looks
same as Django uses and I use Django quite a lot these days (I
understand this is really not a big argument for a project written in
PHP :-))).
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> * Smarty
Link: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.smarty.net/">http://www.smarty.net/</a>
Info: The most known.
What I say: May be not a good choice. Marc gives me the link
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nosmarty.net">http://www.nosmarty.net</a>
At my own, I think Symfony or Zend-Framework would be little overkill.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Well this website rather looks like it is against using separate
template system and prefers using full featured frameworks. It might be
not a bad idea, however it is much more work for us and because of this
I'd stay with separate template system, but possibly with some where
upgrade path to some framework would not be that hard.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>