2014-04-19 13:13 GMT+02:00 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info>:

Le 2014-04-19 05:17, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :

> 2014-04-18 14:18 GMT+02:00 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info

> <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>>:

>
> Le 2014-04-18 08:00, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
> > 2014-04-18 12:41 GMT+02:00 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info
> <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>

> > <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>>>:
> >
> > Le 2014-04-18 05:34, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
> > > 2014-04-17 23:38 GMT+02:00 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info
> <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>
> > <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>>

> > > <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>
> <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>>>>:
> > >
> > > Le 2014-04-17 13:43, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
> > > > 2014-04-17 14:07 GMT+02:00 Marc Delisle
> <marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>
> > <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>>
> > > <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>
> <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>>>
> > > > <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>
> <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>>
> > <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>
> <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>>>>>:
> > > >
> > > > Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
> > > > > 2014-04-17 11:59 GMT+02:00 Hugues Peccatte
> > > > <hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>>
> > > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>>>>:
> > > > >
> > > > >> 2014-04-16 22:16 GMT+02:00 Hugues Peccatte
> > > > <hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>>
> > > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>>>>:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 2014-04-14 13:20 GMT+02:00 Michal Čihař
> > <michal@cihar.com <mailto:michal@cihar.com>
> <mailto:michal@cihar.com <mailto:michal@cihar.com>>
> > > <mailto:michal@cihar.com <mailto:michal@cihar.com>
> <mailto:michal@cihar.com <mailto:michal@cihar.com>>>
> > > > <mailto:michal@cihar.com <mailto:michal@cihar.com>
> <mailto:michal@cihar.com <mailto:michal@cihar.com>>
> > <mailto:michal@cihar.com <mailto:michal@cihar.com>
> <mailto:michal@cihar.com <mailto:michal@cihar.com>>>>>:
> > > > >>> Hi
> > > > >>>> Dne Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:53:52 +0200
> > > > >>>> Hugues Peccatte <hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>>
> > > > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
> <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>>>> napsal(a):
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> I was looking for something more implicit, so we
> > > wouldn't have to
> > > > >>>> change
> > > > >>>>> the calls to $.get. But that seems to be
> > difficult, so your
> > > > solution
> > > > >>>> might
> > > > >>>>> be the best.
> > > > >>>> Well we can also override jQuery.get to do
> what we want
> > > (basically
> > > > >>>> just wrapper around original code to do
> compose the URL
> > > > correctly. That
> > > > >>>> might be cleaner approach.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>> Thanks for this very interesting feedback !
> > > > >>> I found this :
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.bennadel.com/blog/1624-ask-ben-overriding-core-jquery-methods.htm
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I'll try to override the $.get method by this way.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >> It's done… I overwrote $.get… But there is many
> > Jquery methods
> > > > which use
> > > > >> the "&" as an URL parameter separator… I would have
> > love that
> > > > they have a
> > > > >> $.getArgSeparator, like pMA, so we could overwrite
> > this method
> > > > only! :)
> > > > >> We can overwrite all methods which use "&". But
> when
> > we'll want
> > > > to change
> > > > >> the Jquery version, it will be a mess.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Shall we continue to search a way to use another
> > separator
> > > than "&"?
> > > > >> Do you want we to push my work on my repository, so
> > you can see
> > > > what I've
> > > > >> done?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > > I didn't wait for an answer. If you want to check:
> > > > > https://github.com/Tithugues/phpmyadmin/tree/b3733
> > > > >
> > > > > Hugues.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Hugues,
> > > > I have started to review the code; so far it looks
> fine.
> > > >
> > > > In js/messages.php, maybe it would be more
> consistent to
> > call
> > > > PMA_URL_getArgSeparator() ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You're right. It's done.
> > > >
> > > > Hugues.
> > >
> > > Ok. Feel free to merge to master; I'll release -beta1
> afterwards.
> > >
> > >
> > > I really can't… There is still issues with Jquery methods which
> > use the
> > > "&".
> > > That why I asked:
> > > Shall we continue to search a way to use another separator
> than "&"?
> > > Override all methods? I don't think this is a good thing…
> > >
> > > Thanks for your feedback and code review.
> > >
> > > Hugues.
> >
> > Well, it depends: have you tested the behavior of the other jQuery
> > methods that use the "&", when PHP is configured to use ";" as the
> > argument separator?
> >
> >
> > Yes, I still have issues with "&" which is used to concat the URL GET
> > parameters.
> > The "&" is used in 4 Jquery methods. All methods could be overwriten…
> > But what about changing Jquery version ?
> > We'll have to update the code. That's not infeasable, but we have to
> > think remember it. And also to check the other methods of Jquery, to
> > check than another one is not using "&".
> >
> > Hugues.
>
> It's not a good idea to change jQuery itself. I'll release -beta1
> without this patch, let's continue the discussion afterwards.
>
>
> Maybe, the best thing is to… send a pull request to Jquery to manage a
> different arg separator. :)
> If nobody has any idea, I'll may try this…

Yes, but first ask on stackoverflow: there are already 470 000 questions
tagged "jQuery". Or http://forum.jquery.com.

You were right, there is a ticket for this feature (that I didn't find before…) : http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6924

It won't be fix…

I opened a topic on the forum: https://forum.jquery.com/topic/manage-url-argument-separator

Their solution is to override the methods… We can choose this solution, but so, we'll have to remember to update the methods when we'll want to change the Jquery version.

Hugues.