Michael Keck a écrit :Hello, Am 09.03.2010 14:19, schrieb Michal Čihař:Hi Dne Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:26:36 +0100 Michael Keck <sfnet@michaelkeck.de> napsal(a):... if I should use a PHP-Framework, I'm thinking we should use the newest Symfony and if released I would prefer use Symfony Reloaded 2.0 (http://symfony-reloaded.org/). The final release of Reloaded 2.0 is planned for *late 2010* and will only support *PHP 5.3.2*. This mean I (and others to) would have more time for integrate Symfony in PMA.Maybe it was not clear from me, but I think that we should really go just to templates, because using some framework would require much more changes in the code.Okay I see this point ... then I will start with Twig.Michael, what is your plan? When someone downloads a future phpMyAdmin, will he get plain PHP that was compiled by Twig from the code base + templating syntax, or will he get the code base + templating syntax itself? (I have not experienced Twig yet, just read a bit on their site).Should we open a separated development folder for this project?Just a separate branch. Preferably wait with creating it after moving to git (I'll post schedule later today).No problem I can wait .... (I've not done anything cause im clonig at moment). But many thanks.Is it possible to make discussion about comments for html-output? It would be helpfull for me, to search in whole PMA-Scripts for it, and then sperate PHP from HTML. Many Thanks ;)I don't know what kind of comments you want, but as HTML output is really spread around the code, adding comments to identify it and then separate it in another step looks like double work.I mean: if html is generated with php (like echo/print ...) * only in new code *, that would help me. Not in the current code, thats overkill ;) I prefer: /* <!-- HTML OUTPUT --> */ in php code. For direct HTML output (not with php echo/print etc.) I'm have a good script to search after in my IDE ;)