4 Aug
2012
4 Aug
'12
11:48 a.m.
On 03/08/2012 19:48, Marc Delisle wrote:
Rouslan Placella a écrit :
Fair enough, as he said that he already did refactoring work on these
forms, I think that I'll just write a dedicated ajax handler for them as
to avoid further merge conflicts. I'll look into this issue once again
after all the merges, when the table operations code will ve stable.
On 03/08/2012 17:45, Rouslan Placella wrote:
I only meant that you two guys should talk to each other, especially if
you already have changes in your tree about the operations stuff.
It's up to him if he wants to merge these two dialogs; it was not
planned in his schedule. On 03/08/2012 17:43, Marc Delisle wrote:
Or did you mean asking Thilina to look into this? Marc Delisle a écrit :
> Rouslan Placella a écrit :
>> On 03/08/2012 14:19, Marc Delisle wrote:
>>> Michal Čihař a écrit :
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Dne Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:28:31 +0200
>>>> Rouslan Placella <rouslan(a)placella.com> napsal(a):
>>>>
>>>>> Quick question: why do we have two forms for renaming a table on
>>>>> tbl_operations.php? Can one be dropped? Please see attached
screenshot
>>>>> for the location of forms.
>> Well, I have a dilemma about this form in my branch. With the "rename"
>> functionality in the table options form, a dedicated ajax handler is
>> necessary for it to work. Without, the form can be handled by a generic
>> page loading mechanism, which means less code and a more maintainable
>> solution.
>>
>>>> The difference is probably in implementation - in same database, you
>>>> can use just RENAME, for moving data to other database, this might
>>>> fail, so basically it's CREATE TABLE and INSERT .. SELECT.
>> I see, it sounds a bit more complicated than I was hoping for.
>>
>>>> Still it would be better to merge these and use RENAME when possible
>>>> and fallback to complex method if needed.
>>> I'm not sure these should be merged. In the mind of some users, renaming
>>> and moving are different actions.
>> Then we could call it "rename/move"...
> I would be happy with that. It would have the added benefit of removing
> the rename table dialog from the table options fieldset, where it does
> not really belong.
>
By the way, Thilina is refactoring db and tbl operations these days...
Sounds like
one of us will have a few conflicts to resolve. I already
have some committed changes in those areas. When does he expect to
finish up with that?