Hey all,

Here is a speed comparison between a number of major js libraries, which may aid in your decision:  http://mootools.net/slickspeed/

Also, you may want to weigh the pros and cons of the methodologies of the different frameworks, e.g. jQuery keeps all its functionality separated into a separate jQuery object and is therefore less likely to interfere with other js, whereas Prototype prototypes onto the js object classes directly.

On 03/05/2010 06:52 AM, Michael Keck wrote: 

Am 05.03.2010 10:55, schrieb Michal Čihař:
  
Hi

Dne Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:27:15 +0100
Michael Keck <sfnet@michaelkeck.de> napsal(a):

  
    
that's the point why I prefer jQuery.
First building full functional a web app without any javascript.
Then with jQuery add animations, effects, styles and behaviors
to dom elements.
    
      
I don't think it's much different with mootools.
  
    
I don't know mootools in details, but I think it's more a developer
preference.
Somebody likes mootools, other prototype, next ext.js and others jquery.
But I guess with Marc, we should use one js-framework at the moment wich
is the best for us at the moment.
  
  
    
Perhabs, we should use a template engine (like smarty), for
seperating code and layout. Perhabs this would make adding
styles and themes easier. Other point is, all things, that have
not to do with core functions, could be add to the templates,
like plugins, effects or javascripts. And with templates we are
able to cache basics, like menus, help, forms etc. This would
increase performance.
    
      
Yes, we already agreed some time ago that it would be great to use
templates, but it is quite a lot work which nobody did to far :-).
  
    
I will try to do this with smarty. But you're right it's really quite a
lot of work.
It would be nice, to comment in the current development all html-outputs
with a special comment to search for it.
I'm working at the moment on a smarty port in a seperated development
environment and it's really diffucult to get all html outputs by reading
each
script and code.

Then it's possible to create with templates different pma environments:
- with javascript
- without javascript
- for text browsers
- for PDAs
- etc.

The other point with a template base soulution is, it doesn't really matter
wich framework for javascript is used. Cause it's included in the templates.

A other great thing is, other great oss projects are able to use our core
functional in their own applications.

Regards
Michael




  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev

_______________________________________________
Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
Phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel