> Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 15:10:48 +0200
> To: phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Error reports
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Dieter Adriaenssens
> <dieter.adriaenssens@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2013/7/5 Mohamed Ashraf <mohamed.ashraf.213@gmail.com>:
> >> For the server side component of the error reporting system. What are
> >> the things you want to do with the reports. like for example comments,
> >> or storing status of the reports. what other things do think you would
> >> want to do on the error reporting server.
> >>
> >> What I am thinking is commenting, changing status, searching and of
> >> course viewing all the details of the report as well as related
> >> reports.
> >>
> >> Do you want the ability to delete error reports or just mark them as
> >> resolved. and while we are on the matter what are the statuses that
> >> should exist for the error reports. I am thinking at least new and
> >> resolved but I cant think of anything else;
> >>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see this server as a go-between for getting error reports into our
> > existing bug-tracker [0] at Sourceforge.
> >
> > I think it should gather error reports, group them and have the
> > possibility of inserting it in the bug-tracker, no need to mimic the
> > functionality of the existing bug-tracker.
> I was going to do something like that for github issues since I am
> already using github authentication. I think that doing this for
> sourceforge issue tracker is better since it the one you actually use.
> I however cannot use sourceforge authentication because it doesn't
> provide an api to get user info so I will have to both have github and
> sourceforge connection

You might want to take a look at the Allura API [1].
As far as I can see, you have OAuth for authenticating there.
Am I overlooking something?

[1] https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Allura%20API/

JM

> >
> > F.e. when a error report comes in, the server should check if it is
> > similar (= identical) to existing reports. If it is, group them, and
> > give the new report the same status as the existing one(s).
> > If it is new, mark as to review, and/or send it to the bug-tracker.
> the problem with automatic submission is spam. I think that alot of
> error reports that are very similar but not identical would be
> submitted if automatic submission is followed. due to the different
> ways browsers send their stacktraces and handle errors in general some
> reports with the same problem appear to be different thus submitted
> individually. I think that it should be done manually when a member
> requests it.
>
> also should the bug submission in sourceforge come from the account of
> the user who submitted it (requiring a sourceforge connection) or from
> a separate account for the error reporting system which would render
> the sourceforge connection no longer required.
>
> >
> > So statuses could be new/unreviewed, open (bug-tracker ticket is still
> > open), resolved (bug was fixed).
> >
> > [0] http://sourceforge.net/p/phpmyadmin/bugs/
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Dieter Adriaenssens
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> >
> > Build for Windows Store.
> >
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
> > Phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
> Phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel