On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Michal Čihař michal@cihar.com wrote:
Hi
Dne Tue, 22 May 2012 22:37:47 +0530 Chanaka Dharmarathna pe.chanaka.ck@gmail.com napsal(a):
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Rouslan Placella <rouslan@placella.com wrote:
BTW, what about extending our existing PMA_Table class? I'm not sure
how
good of an idea it is, so I'm just throwing it out there...
I don't think this would be useful, this class should care less about table (actually should be table independent) and more oriented on displaying results.
Thanks for participating to this discussion and share your valuable suggestions.
As I remember Michal has already suggested to not to use an object of
this
case. And use PMA_Display::someFunction where needed. Thats why I focused on static fields and behaviors.
Well it was just a naming condition, you should really make that object, get parameters in constructor. So basically Rouslans example is what I would expect.
The constructor of the function only executed, if create an object of a class. (I think your code trying to say create an object, new keyword is missing there). So I don't think to get the use of a constructor. That's why I'm using a function for initialize instance variables.
I'm agreed to use more meaningful name. It is better if we can name it as PMA_DisplayTable .
PMA_DisplayResults might be better. Please remember this should not be about displaying tables but results of any SQL query - results of stored procedure, browsing SQL processes or displaying binary log.
-- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list Phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
Hi Michal,
I was thinking of get the use of this class by using an object as in my proposal [0]. But, I had misunderstood your comment about creating an object. That's why I looked into this way. Any way it's a mistake by me.
Thanks for getting me into the right track soon. I'll introduce the new design of the class as soon as possible.
[0] : http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/chanaka77...
Regards !