> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Marc Delisle <
marc@infomarc.info> wrote:
>
>> Le 2013-01-19 11:20, Madhura Jayaratne a écrit :
>>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Rouslan Placella <
rouslan@placella.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking that it would be quite nice if the "groups" in the new sf
>>>> tracker were reverse sorted. I mean, who cares about "2.11.9", it's not
>>>> even supported, it should be bottom of the list. On the other hand,
>>>> "latest_git" and "3.5.5" are the most likely candidates for a new bug
>>>> and should be at the top of the list.
>>>>
>>>> Is there someone we can ask to fix this?
>>>>
>>>> Bye,
>>>> Rouslan
>>>>
>>>> On a related note, it would be nice to have a pre-set search with the
>>> following criteria
>>> status : open or unread
>>> owner : none
>>> sorted by artifact number in desc order.
>>>
>>> This should list the bugs that a developer can work on, in one click.
>>
>> Madhura,
>> what should be the name of this search?
>>
>> I'm not really sure. "Fix me", may be?? :)