Le sam. 3 oct. 2015 à 21:13, Hugues Peccatte <hugues.peccatte@gmail.com> a écrit :
Le sam. 3 oct. 2015 à 12:46, Remi Collet <remi@fedoraproject.org> a écrit :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le 03/10/2015 09:14, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
> Dear developers,
>
> The following PR is trying to use namespaces and autoloading for
> pMA: https://github.com/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin/pull/11428 This PR
> seems to be quite stable now. As almost all PHP files had been
> updated, this is a huge work to test all cases, all configurations,
> all features. Would it be possible to have some testers please?

At a first (and quick) look

PMA\libraries namespace seems a bit uggly...

'libraries' is a directory, only a layout artefact, why should it be
part of the namespace.

Per PSR-4 definition, namespace should be

        "The fully qualified class name MUST have a top-level
        namespace name, also known as a "vendor namespace".

So, is PMA the "vendor" ? it seems.

        "The fully qualified class name MAY have one or
        more sub-namespace names."

I think a second level is needed (but again, "libraries" seems strange
to me... but perhaps only to me)

Notice: it will be nice to move all 3rd party lib to a separate
directory (will make downstream work much easier)

Remi.

> Thanks to Marc and Isaac who already did a lot of tests. And thanks
> to new testers.
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> H.
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Developers mailing
> list Developers@phpmyadmin.net
> https://lists.phpmyadmin.net/mailman/listinfo/developers
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlYPhnsACgkQYUppBSnxahgeqQCgrqY4W1TuTzxvpiwSLcVfiVKq
lUYAoIopoJ4hHCeYEdGD7YFGsPUg6htx
=d2Wp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hi Remi,

Thanks for your feedback. 

Why does PMA\libraries seem ugly?
OK, "libraries" is a directory, but all classes are not in libraries, that's why I decided to set the vendor namespace (PMA) at project root. If needed, we can imagine to have a specific vendor namespace for libraries, but why and which one?

I saw your notice about moving 3rd party libraries. But I think this is not the subject here.
In fact, this is a really huge work that had been done (at least, I think…) and I think that a lot of subjects could be discussed here. That's why I'ld like to focus on test and errors.

Had you some time to test the PR?

Thanks,
H.

Hi,

Any other feedback please? Or maybe we can merge…

H.