On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Michal Čihař <michal@cihar.com> wrote:
Hi

Dne Mon, 5 May 2014 22:41:04 +0530
Dhananjay Nakrani <dhananjaynakrani@gmail.com> napsal(a):

> I am about to start the development on my GSoC project. I have some doubts
> about the workflow that I should resolve before starting the development.
> This is the workflow of GSoC project as I per my understanding.
>
> Commit everything in a separate branch of own repositories and at the end
> create a pull request for all the commits of the project.

It is better to make separate pull requests for every feature or simply
whenever it makes sense. The pull request is usually the place to
review your code, so doing this more frequent helps both mentor (to not
have huge pieces of code to review) and student (to avoid possibility
of needing to rewrite huge blocks of code if they don't pass the
review).

> Now, which branch should I use as the base branch while creating a separate
> one for my project development? Should I use 'master' or 'QA_4_2'?

Generally any new features are developed on master branch, see also
https://wiki.phpmyadmin.net/pma/Developer_guidelines#Branches_in_Git

--
        Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://phpmyadmin.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
Phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel


Okay, then I will use master as the base branch. 
Creating pulls for each feature makes more sense, so I'll follow that style of workflow. 


Thanks again.
Dhananjay Nakrani.