29 Sep
2006
29 Sep
'06
7:20 p.m.
--On Friday, September 29, 2006 12:53 PM -0400 Marc Delisle Marc.Delisle@cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca wrote:
as suggested by Sebastian, maybe the next stable version with security fixes should be named 2.9.0.1.
Is it too late, now that 2.9.1-rc1 has been released? I think it would be better to name it 2.9.0.1.
Is the intention to distinguish between non-critical and critical bug fixes by using the 3rd versus 4th version field? (I have no preference. I'm just looking for clarification on how to interpret the resulting version number.)