X-Auth-No: Return-Path: Received: from relais.cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca not authenticated [192.219.64.2] by cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 1.5 $ on Novell NetWare; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:29:57 -0500 Received: from oskar.webpack.hosteurope.de (oskar.webpack.hosteurope.de [217.115.142.86]) by relais.cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0O6Tqa9009401 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:29:53 -0500 Received: by oskar.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.51 using esmtpa from dslb-084-057-065-183.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.57.65.183]) id 1F1Hgd-0008Fw-WF; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:29:52 +0100 Message-ID: <43D5C95F.10804@sebastianmendel.de> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:29:51 +0100 From: Sebastian Mendel User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Delisle Subject: Re: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: 2.7.1 roadmap References: <43CCEF44.6050400@cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca> <43D0ACB6.3060601@sebastianmendel.de> <20060120135806.5be308f1@localhost.localdomain> <43D0E260.9010303@cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca> <20060123220925.5511c9e4@localhost> <43D57518.6010405@cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca> In-Reply-To: <43D57518.6010405@cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Cegep-Sherbrooke-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Cegep-Sherbrooke-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Cegep-Sherbrooke-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.599, requis 4, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Cegep-Sherbrooke-MailScanner-From: lists@sebastianmendel.de Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relais.cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca id k0OCkMHe012645 Marc Delisle schrieb: > Michal =C4=8Ciha=C5=99 a =C3=A9crit : >> Hi >> >> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:15:12 -0500 >> Marc Delisle wrote: >> >>> I think Sebastian's idea is to say that release 2.8.1 does not have=20 >>> more features than 2.8.0, only bugfixes. Critical bugfixes can still=20 >>> be named with -plX. >> >> Okay, this sounds reasonable for me. But maybe then we could abandon >> those -plX as it just complicates versioning scheme. >> >=20 > So it's time to clarify the branch names. >=20 > HEAD would contain the new features + obviously all the bug fixes. >=20 > RELEASE_2_8_0 would contain ... 2.8.0, what a surprise! HEAD - branch 2_8 - branch 2_8_0 // * 2006-01-23 * release 2_8_0_0 // RC1 release 2_8_0_1 // RC2 release 2_8_0_2 // FINAL release 2_8_0_3 // very quick release (security fix, pl1) - branch 2_8_1 normal fix reales release 2_8_1_0 // RC1 ?? release 2_8_1_1 // FINAL release 2_8_1_2 // very quick release (security fix, pl1) - ... - branch 2_9 // * 2006-03-?? * - ... just like this one: http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roadmap/archives/2005_12.html to keep it small, we have always only two branches open --=20 sebastian