Le mar. 25 août 2015 à 12:06, Atul Pratap Singh atulpratapsingh05@gmail.com a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Hugues Peccatte < hugues.peccatte@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
phpMyAdmin's ruleset is based on PEAR standards. One of this standard (PEAR_Sniffs_NamingConventions_ValidVariableNameSniff) is to name class' attributes / methods with a leading underscore when the element is protected / private. This rule is quite useful because it helps to see very quickly if an element is public or not. But http://www.php-fig.org/psr/psr-2/#4-2-properties asks not to use this leading underscore. For attributes, I'm not sure this is a big deal because almost all the attributes shouldn't be visible and accessible only by getters / setters. But for methods, there is nothing to know the visibility of a method. However actual IDE help to see this.
Do you think that we should follow PSR2? Only for attributes maybe? Should we consider to base our ruleset on another standard closest to PSR rules?
Hi,
I agree to follow PSR-2 no underscore recommendation for attributes and going forward we may lean more towards PSR, specifically about achieving codebase wide autoloading of classes(PSR-4).
Also, I think https://github.com/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin/pull/11365 needs to be rebased.
-- Regards
Atul Pratap Singh
Hi,
I won't rebase the branch but remove it. I'll see the modifications I can do to stick to PSR 0 to 2 rules.
H.