> Hi Marc,
>
> Hi,
>> can someone explain the goal of this method? AFAIK it's never called.
>>
>>
> I introduce this method inside PMA_DisplayResults class.
> As you mentioned, this method has used nowhere.
> I thought that this will useful for further improvements as well generally
> getter setter methods use inside classes.
> But not sure it will definitely use in future.
>
> It can be removed since it is not using at the moment.
> What should be better ?
>
> Regards !

Chanaka,
I'm not sure, let's see opinions of others on this.
I think, as to set the local PMA_CommonFunctions object of any class using setCommonFunctions(), we would always need the existing single object using PMA_CommonFunctions::getInstance().
And when we use local getCommonFunctions(), it already sets the local PMA_CommonFunctions object to PMA_CommonFunctions::getInstance(). So I see no particular utility of setCommonFunctions().

Hi Marc,

I introduce common setter method for set any property of that class.
So I'll remove setCommonFunctions() function since the expected behavior can obtain from the common setter.

Hi Atul,

Seems that is the point.
Since PMA_CommonFunctions is a singleton class, that method makes no sense.
Anyway I'm going to remove it. :)

Regards !
--
____________________________________

Chanaka Indrajith
Bsc.Computer Engineering Undergraduate
Faculty of Engineering
University of Peradeniya
Sri Lanka
____________________________________