> <mailto:
marc@infomarc.info>> wrote:
>
> Le 2011-04-03 07:43, Ammar Yasir a écrit :
>
> >
> > Yes, probably or like collisions resolution in hashing. I'll
> think on it
> > more.
> > I've submitted my proposal, hoping to get some feedback. Is it
> okay if we
> > concentrate more on a stable,usable product than implement many
> advanced
> > functionality? Because here it seems to be the case where we can
> add a lot
> > of statistics into the system.
>
> Choosing what is basic functionality and what is advanced, is open to
> interpretation; a usability test with a group can tell you more.
>
> I agree.
>
> Also, in the proposal should we mention exact working of the zooming
> tool? I'm thinking that the functionality is fairly clear and many of
> available plugins could well be of use. So we can maybe use those (with
> modifications to our needs) instead of coding everything from scratch.
> It will also be good if the zooming tool is something like they have
> used earlier e.g. like google maps zooming. User might find such system
> more friendly.