On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> wrote:
Le 2013-01-19 11:20, Madhura Jayaratne a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Rouslan Placella <rouslan@placella.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was thinking that it would be quite nice if the "groups" in the new sf
>> tracker were reverse sorted. I mean, who cares about "2.11.9", it's not
>> even supported, it should be bottom of the list. On the other hand,
>> "latest_git" and "3.5.5" are the most likely candidates for a new bug
>> and should be at the top of the list.
>>
>> Is there someone we can ask to fix this?
>>
>> Bye,
>> Rouslan
>>
>> On a related note, it would be nice to have a pre-set search with the
> following criteria
> status : open or unread
> owner : none
> sorted by artifact number in desc order.
>
> This should list the bugs that a developer can work on, in one click.

Madhura,
what should be the name of this search?

I'm not really sure. "Fix me", may be?? :) 

--
Thanks and Regards,

Madhura Jayaratne