Le 2014-04-18 05:34, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :

> 2014-04-17 23:38 GMT+02:00 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info

> <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>>:

>
>     Le 2014-04-17 13:43, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
>     > 2014-04-17 14:07 GMT+02:00 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info
>     <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>

>     > <mailto:marc@infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>>>:

>     >
>     >     Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
>     >     > 2014-04-17 11:59 GMT+02:00 Hugues Peccatte
>     >     <hugues.peccatte@gmail.com <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>

>     <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>>:

>     >     >
>     >     >> 2014-04-16 22:16 GMT+02:00 Hugues Peccatte
>     >     <hugues.peccatte@gmail.com <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>

>     <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>>:

>     >     >>
>     >     >>  2014-04-14 13:20 GMT+02:00 Michal Čihař <michal@cihar.com
>     <mailto:michal@cihar.com>

>     >     <mailto:michal@cihar.com <mailto:michal@cihar.com>>>:

>     >     >>> Hi
>     >     >>>> Dne Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:53:52 +0200
>     >     >>>> Hugues Peccatte <hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
>     <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>

>     >     <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com

>     <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>> napsal(a):
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>>> I was looking for something more implicit, so we
>     wouldn't have to
>     >     >>>> change
>     >     >>>>> the calls to $.get. But that seems to be difficult, so your
>     >     solution
>     >     >>>> might
>     >     >>>>> be the best.
>     >     >>>> Well we can also override jQuery.get to do what we want
>     (basically
>     >     >>>> just wrapper around original code to do compose the URL
>     >     correctly. That
>     >     >>>> might be cleaner approach.
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>> Thanks for this very interesting feedback !
>     >     >>> I found this :
>     >     >>>
>     >
>     http://www.bennadel.com/blog/1624-ask-ben-overriding-core-jquery-methods.htm
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>> I'll try to override the $.get method by this way.
>     >     >>>
>     >     >> It's done… I overwrote $.get… But there is many Jquery methods
>     >     which use
>     >     >> the "&" as an URL parameter separator… I would have love that
>     >     they have a
>     >     >> $.getArgSeparator, like pMA, so we could overwrite this method
>     >     only! :)
>     >     >> We can overwrite all methods which use "&". But when we'll want
>     >     to change
>     >     >> the Jquery version, it will be a mess.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Shall we continue to search a way to use another separator
>     than "&"?
>     >     >> Do you want we to push my work on my repository, so you can see
>     >     what I've
>     >     >> done?
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     > I didn't wait for an answer. If you want to check:
>     >     > https://github.com/Tithugues/phpmyadmin/tree/b3733
>     >     >
>     >     > Hugues.
>     >
>     >     Hi Hugues,
>     >     I have started to review the code; so far it looks fine.
>     >
>     >     In js/messages.php, maybe it would be more consistent to call
>     >     PMA_URL_getArgSeparator() ?
>     >
>     >
>     > You're right. It's done.
>     >
>     > Hugues.
>
>     Ok. Feel free to merge to master; I'll release -beta1 afterwards.
>
>
> I really can't… There is still issues with Jquery methods which use the
> "&".
> That why I asked:
> Shall we continue to search a way to use another separator than "&"?
> Override all methods? I don't think this is a good thing…
>
> Thanks for your feedback and code review.
>
> Hugues.

Well, it depends: have you tested the behavior of the other jQuery
methods that use the "&", when PHP is configured to use ";" as the
argument separator?