Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Hi,
how about changing our changelog structure?
are you all happy with current structure?
I agree with your proposed changes. It's important also to credit people for patches, translations, etc. in the ChangeLog (and in Documentation.html for big credits).
yes - of course, like we do it now, or?
All entries for 2007 could be changed to the new format. I suggest that every committer changes his part (unless you are volunteer :) ).
i could do - but i would wait for other comments
Michal, any comment on this?
Marc
just an appendix 'thanks to loveleyUser' in case of patches or other merged code
Why the "create branch" messages?
to see that all changes before this message are in this branch too
Hmmm, changes later than this "create branch" message can also be in this branch because we often backport.
yes, thats why i wrote we should mark such backports
2006-07-12 User - User * SECURITY: #123458 - blah blah [QA_2_10, QA_2_9]
some suggestion:
- date only once per day
- prefix type if change: bugfix, change, new
- add module info, f.e. sqlparser, config, themes, import, ...
release info in trunk changelog do says nothing - if we not also include info in later chnages if it was backported to any other branch
do we really need to list all changed files? i think this comes from long ago when no versioning system was used!?
f.e.:
2006-07-13 User - USer - BUGFIX: #123456 - bug report title - BUGFIX: some notices User2 - USer2 + NEW: [themes] new feature in themes / CHANGED: [gui] changed all layout table into fieldsets
2006-07-12 User - User * SECURITY: #123458 - blah blah [QA_2_10, QA_2_9]
2006-07-11 User - User > BRANCH: created branch QA_2_10