15 Apr
2004
15 Apr
'04
1:13 p.m.
Hi
On 15.04.2004 16:40 +0200, Marcel Tschopp wrote:
I agree. You also have to use
session_set_save_handler when using a db...
I agree also that it is less work, but using a db don't uses very much
work...
Olivier wrote:
Php sessions work also without cookies and you can store them anywhere
you want (see session_set_save_handler). This is definitely less work
than custom system and also probably more efficient. On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 12:23 +0200, Garvin Hicking
wrote:
Yes, for session security I think it is better to use a mysql table to
store session data. And the user has not to use cookies... - Get sessions to work, to get around POST/GETing
the SQL query or the resultset
data from page to page. This is the reason for many timeout/browser problems
when editing records
using php-sessions, or a custom system, based for example on a mysql
table? - After that is all done, make PMA work on all
OpenSource RDBMS ;)
This would be interesting, but would not be phpmyadmin anymore.
This could be called 'PearDbAdmin', 'PhpDbAdmin',
'PhpAdodbAdmin',
etc... :)
just googled a bit: phpdbadmin is already there, at least on SF:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpdbadmin/, but:
"Development Status: 1 - Planning", and seems to be dead. Description
is: "PHP-based (multiple-)database administration utility. Bringing
multiple database servers and multiple databases together into one
simple web-based interface. The power of PHP and the ease of the web.
Currently planned to allow easy simultaneous access" - get rid
of all the HTML/javascript code from the PHP files
-> templates. would require quite a lot of work, so
probably it would be good to start from scratch
+1 for templates. The coding
would be much easier! - focus
on php5/mysql 4.1+ only (and of course continue to improve
PMA 2.x for php4 and mysql4)
My idea is also to make the code cleaner, eg. use
an oo-style api (php5),
pear coding standarts, pear documentation standarts etc.
> - newbie / expert mode (newbie -> for example to let my mother update
> her guestbook entries, expert -> for php devels, etc.) > - use "standard" gettext/po files
for translations
Probably easier to maintain, but it increases number of php modules
needed. How is it with gettext availability on windows?
> - online interface for translations (put all
the strings in a db, to
> let the translators update their stuff directely)
Do you know any system that would allow this for po fileS?
- we
currently have a low manpower. Any plan will have to take this into account,
even though I agree that the release of 3.0 can attract some other developers
Agreed. Eventually we should write that on the phpmyadmin.net homepage?
- we have a very big features requests list; some day we will have to deal with it
Yes, but at the moment it is really hard to implement those features. As
I said above I would really like to make a complete rewrite for 3.0.0.
How do you think about that?
- bug fixing takes a lot of time (but I agree that a part of this could be avoided
with some structural changes in the code)
Some structural changes or complete
rewrite? :-)
--
Regards
Michal ÄihaÅ
http://cihar.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=cli…
_______________________________________________
Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
Phpmyadmin-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
Kind regards
Marcel