Hi there,
Marc Delisle wrote:
Hi all, updated version:
Looks good. Although we do not plan to release a second alpha, I'd suggest to name this one "2.6.0-alpha1", just because we do so for release candidates and patch levels, too.
Waiting a few hours for alpha release.
I'm done with everything, so you can release if you want. If the offset error is hard to fix at the moment, just leave it for now: I don't think that it would be a showstopper for an alpha release.
I prepared a release announcement for the alpha release because I thought it could be helpful for attracting testers... You'd just need to add your list of changes. :-)
As you might notice, I modified the copyright line inside the announcement: I only listed those developers that actually worked on this release. Since we are still referring to the credits sections of the docs, this should be OK, as far as I can tell. I'd like to use this one in our README, too, if you don't have any objections.
Let's have a clean 2.6.0.