Le mar. 6 oct. 2015 à 22:35, Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> a écrit :
Le 2015-10-06 14:47, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
> Le lun. 5 oct. 2015 à 22:07, Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info
> <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>> a écrit :
>
>     Le 2015-10-05 13:46, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
>     > Le sam. 3 oct. 2015 à 21:13, Hugues Peccatte
>     <hugues.peccatte@gmail.com <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>
>     > <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com
>     <mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>>> a écrit :
>     >
>     >     Le sam. 3 oct. 2015 à 12:46, Remi Collet
>     <remi@fedoraproject.org <mailto:remi@fedoraproject.org>
>     >     <mailto:remi@fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:remi@fedoraproject.org>>> a écrit :
>     >
>     > Le 03/10/2015 09:14, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
>     >> Dear developers,
>     >
>     >> The following PR is trying to use namespaces and autoloading for
>     >> pMA: https://github.com/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin/pull/11428 This PR
>     >> seems to be quite stable now. As almost all PHP files had been
>     >> updated, this is a huge work to test all cases, all
>     > configurations,
>     >> all features. Would it be possible to have some testers please?
>     >
>     > At a first (and quick) look
>     >
>     > PMA\libraries namespace seems a bit uggly...
>     >
>     > 'libraries' is a directory, only a layout artefact, why should it be
>     > part of the namespace.
>     >
>     > Per PSR-4 definition, namespace should be
>     >
>     >         "The fully qualified class name MUST have a top-level
>     >         namespace name, also known as a "vendor namespace".
>     >
>     > So, is PMA the "vendor" ? it seems.
>     >
>     >         "The fully qualified class name MAY have one or
>     >         more sub-namespace names."
>     >
>     > I think a second level is needed (but again, "libraries" seems
>     > strange
>     > to me... but perhaps only to me)
>     >
>     > Notice: it will be nice to move all 3rd party lib to a separate
>     > directory (will make downstream work much easier)
>     >
>     > Remi.
>     >
>     >> Thanks to Marc and Isaac who already did a lot of tests. And
>     > thanks
>     >> to new testers.
>     >
>     >> Have a nice day,
>     >
>     >> H.
>     >
>     >
>     >> _______________________________________________ Developers mailing
>     >> list Developers@phpmyadmin.net <mailto:Developers@phpmyadmin.net>
>     <mailto:Developers@phpmyadmin.net <mailto:Developers@phpmyadmin.net>>
>     >> https://lists.phpmyadmin.net/mailman/listinfo/developers
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     Hi Remi,
>     >
>     >     Thanks for your feedback.
>     >
>     >     Why does PMA\libraries seem ugly?
>     >     OK, "libraries" is a directory, but all classes are not in
>     >     libraries, that's why I decided to set the vendor namespace
>     (PMA) at
>     >     project root. If needed, we can imagine to have a specific vendor
>     >     namespace for libraries, but why and which one?
>     >
>     >     I saw your notice about moving 3rd party libraries. But I
>     think this
>     >     is not the subject here.
>     >     In fact, this is a really huge work that had been done (at
>     least, I
>     >     think…) and I think that a lot of subjects could be discussed
>     here.
>     >     That's why I'ld like to focus on test and errors.
>     >
>     >     Had you some time to test the PR?
>     >
>     >     Thanks,
>     >     H.
>     >
>     >
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > Any other feedback please? Or maybe we can merge…
>
>     Seems ready indeed.
>
>
>     --
>     Marc Delisle | phpMyAdmin
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your answer Marc.
> I'll merge again master in the branch and then it should be OK. Do you
> want me to do the merge (by GitHub)?

Please do.

--
Marc Delisle | phpMyAdmin
 
Hi everyone,

The merge will be done in some minutes. I just wait for the return of https://travis-ci.org/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin/builds/84153692

H.