19 Oct
2005
19 Oct
'05
6:22 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
As you have noticed, I have been busy for some while.
Because of this, I've hardly followed the discussions on the mailing
lists and now I'm trying to catch up with the development, again. Could
you guys give me a little update? ;-)
Just some things I noticed while testing HEAD:
1) The interface scaling is partly broken, as far as I can see. With the
default theme, all the text is displayed way too large - except for the
optgroups in the database selection. With the darkblue / organge theme,
it looks better, but there are still some places, where table captions
are displayed too large.
I noticed, that you've worked on some XHTML-related stuff, so I guess
this is still under contruction? I could provide screen shots, if you
want me to.
2) On server_status.php, I noticed that you have devided the variables
into groups and added small descriptions. Well, at least for the
different storage engines, I started doing the same on
server_engines.php. For some variables, we now have even redundant
descriptions in our lang files. :-/
Regarding the fact, that server_status.php has become quite large, I'd
suggest to move the stuff that is related to a specific storage engine
to server_engines.php and libraries/engines.
3) I have worked on a code splitup of server_privileges.php in order to
implement the new MySQL 5 privileges, including the new privilege level
and removing all "SELECT ... FROM mysql" queries on MySQL 5. I had to
stop because of some bugs in MySQL 5, that have been fixed meanwhile.
Is anyone working on the privilege system right now? Otherwise, I'd
resume my work and try to merge it with the changes you have made during
the time I've been inactive.
Regards,
AMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDVoCH8c/ssWf/SMcRAnF6AKCsNljPChPV69LOIsStc/+1nT1BcwCfRuYo
MQ772WyWvaSDadcrR5fQfDM=
=v8Xd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
19 Oct
19 Oct
6:35 a.m.
Alexander M. Turek a écrit :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
As you have noticed, I have been busy for some while.
Because of this, I've hardly followed the discussions on the mailing
lists and now I'm trying to catch up with the development, again. Could
you guys give me a little update? ;-)
Just some things I noticed while testing HEAD:
1) The interface scaling is partly broken, as far as I can see. With the
default theme, all the text is displayed way too large - except for the
optgroups in the database selection. With the darkblue / organge theme,
it looks better, but there are still some places, where table captions
are displayed too large.
I noticed, that you've worked on some XHTML-related stuff, so I guess
this is still under contruction? I could provide screen shots, if you
want me to.
2) On server_status.php, I noticed that you have devided the variables
into groups and added small descriptions. Well, at least for the
different storage engines, I started doing the same on
server_engines.php. For some variables, we now have even redundant
descriptions in our lang files. :-/
Regarding the fact, that server_status.php has become quite large, I'd
suggest to move the stuff that is related to a specific storage engine
to server_engines.php and libraries/engines.
3) I have worked on a code splitup of server_privileges.php in order to
implement the new MySQL 5 privileges, including the new privilege level
and removing all "SELECT ... FROM mysql" queries on MySQL 5. I had to
stop because of some bugs in MySQL 5, that have been fixed meanwhile.
Is anyone working on the privilege system right now? Otherwise, I'd
resume my work and try to merge it with the changes you have made during
the time I've been inactive.
As you can see from HEAD, server_privileges.php now supports MySQL 5
privileges. Still TODO: REQUIRE clause of GRANT:
NONE SSL X509 CIPHER ISSUER SUBJECT
Marc
Regards,
AMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDVoCH8c/ssWf/SMcRAnF6AKCsNljPChPV69LOIsStc/+1nT1BcwCfRuYo
MQ772WyWvaSDadcrR5fQfDM=
=v8Xd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
Phpmyadmin-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
6:44 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marc,
Marc Delisle schrieb:
As you can see from HEAD, server_privileges.php now supports MySQL 5
privileges.
But it does not support privileges granted on routine level and it still
fetches the privileges from mysql.User etc, I guess.
Still TODO: REQUIRE clause of GRANT:
NONE SSL X509 CIPHER ISSUER SUBJECT
I know, but as lang as we don't support SSL connections to the MySQL
server, this is a hard thing to test. :-)
Regards,
AMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDVoWe8c/ssWf/SMcRApjiAKCztMXEZsBwzquNVAREkd3TXeBmlwCeNBdE
MHf11BC+S0Jw0RlwaxLmNjg=
=HKsL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
7:11 a.m.
Alexander M. Turek a écrit :
I don't see your point. SHOW GRANTS reports those options so we can
report about them, and we can generate a GRANT command containing them.
This way, PMA can be used to manage accounts for users of applications
which implement mysqli_ssl_set(), even if PMA itself does not use SSL
connections to MySQL.
Marc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marc,
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Right. On a side note, we have check_user_privileges.lib.php that is
used to see who can create a db and a table, and to see who is
super-user for importing, based on SHOW GRANTS.
As you can see from HEAD, server_privileges.php
now supports MySQL 5
privileges.
But it does not support privileges granted on routine level and it still
fetches the privileges from mysql.User etc, I guess. Still TODO: REQUIRE clause of GRANT:
NONE SSL X509 CIPHER ISSUER SUBJECT
I know, but as lang as we don't support SSL connections to the MySQL
server, this is a hard thing to test. :-) 
6:49 p.m.
Alexander M. Turek wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
As you have noticed, I have been busy for some while.
Because of this, I've hardly followed the discussions on the mailing
lists and now I'm trying to catch up with the development, again. Could
you guys give me a little update? ;-)
Just some things I noticed while testing HEAD:
1) The interface scaling is partly broken, as far as I can see. With the
default theme, all the text is displayed way too large - except for the
optgroups in the database selection. With the darkblue / organge theme,
it looks better, but there are still some places, where table captions
are displayed too large.
I noticed, that you've worked on some XHTML-related stuff, so I guess
this is still under contruction?
yes, XHTML compliance and more semantic (less tables more fieldsets
aso.) and moving all styling into css is still in work ...
I could provide screen shots, if you want me to.
yes, please!
2) On server_status.php, I noticed that you have
devided the variables
into groups and added small descriptions. Well, at least for the
different storage engines, I started doing the same on
server_engines.php. For some variables, we now have even redundant
descriptions in our lang files. :-/
oh, sorry, i didn't noticed ...
Regarding the fact, that server_status.php has become
quite large, I'd
suggest to move the stuff that is related to a specific storage engine
to server_engines.php and libraries/engines.
yes, this was the next step i was also planning ... and even further
same to the replication and SSL
--
Sebastian Mendel
www.sebastianmendel.de
www.sf.net/projects/phpdatetime | www.sf.net/projects/phptimesheet
6:52 p.m.
Alexander M. Turek wrote:
Could you guys give me a little update? ;-)
i have done some translation in german*, but i have left a comment on
every newly translated string, so you can take a look over this and just
remove the comments if all fine
search for: //recently translated
--
Sebastian Mendel
www.sebastianmendel.de
www.sf.net/projects/phpdatetime | www.sf.net/projects/phptimesheet
24 Oct
24 Oct
9:37 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Hi
On Wed 19. 10. 2005 19:21, Alexander M. Turek wrote:
1) The interface scaling is partly broken, as far as I
can see. With
the default theme, all the text is displayed way too large - except
for the optgroups in the database selection.
The default theme uses fonts you have configured in your browser, I
don't see anything wrong on this (if you like smaller fonts, configure
your browser).
With the darkblue /
organge theme, it looks better, but there are still some places,
where table captions are displayed too large.
These themes use absolutely specified font sizes, what is not good. See
[1] for some explanation (there are more resources on this topic on
web, just google them).
1. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-CSS-TECHS/#units
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com
29 Oct
29 Oct
7:05 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
On Wed 19. 10. 2005 19:21, Alexander M. Turek wrote:
Yes, but with the same browser settings, the default theme in 2.6.4
displayed a font size that was much smaller and "correct".
In Firefox, I have to hit ctrl/- twice to go back to the same size as in
2.6.4.
Marc
1) The interface scaling is partly broken, as far
as I can see. With
the default theme, all the text is displayed way too large - except
for the optgroups in the database selection.
The default theme uses fonts you have configured in your browser, I
don't see anything wrong on this (if you like smaller fonts, configure
your browser). With the darkblue /
organge theme, it looks better, but there are still some places,
where table captions are displayed too large.
These themes use absolutely specified font sizes, what is not good. See
[1] for some explanation (there are more resources on this topic on
web, just google them).
1. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-CSS-TECHS/#units
8:15 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
On Sat 29. 10. 2005 16:02, Marc Delisle wrote:
Yes, but with the same browser settings, the default
theme in 2.6.4
displayed a font size that was much smaller and "correct".
What is "correct" half of settings I have in browser? We were using
small font size before, now it is normal.
In Firefox, I have to hit ctrl/- twice to go back to
the same size as
in 2.6.4.
Just set fonts you'd like to see in firefox.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com
8:29 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: default font size
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Marc
On Sat 29. 10. 2005 16:02, Marc Delisle wrote:
Ok I see. I would even say that now we are using text a bit smaller than
normal; for example, comparing the output of
<html><body><p>No tables found in
database.</p></body></html>
with what comes from PMA. But it's ok like this...
Yes, but with the same browser settings, the
default theme in 2.6.4
displayed a font size that was much smaller and "correct".
What is "correct" half of settings I have in browser? We were using
small font size before, now it is normal. In Firefox, I have to hit ctrl/- twice to go back
to the same size as
in 2.6.4.
Just set fonts you'd like to see in firefox.
8:53 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: default font size
On Sat 29. 10. 2005 21:28, Marc Delisle wrote:
Ok I see. I would even say that now we are using text
a bit smaller
than normal; for example, comparing the output of
<html><body><p>No tables found in
database.</p></body></html>
with what comes from PMA. But it's ok like this...
What browser/OS do you use? Well I'm more interested which branch of
PMA_setFontSizes you will get.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com
9:05 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: default font size
Michal Čihař a écrit :
On Sat 29. 10. 2005 21:28, Marc Delisle wrote:
Currently I am on
PMA_USR_OS == Linux
PMA_USR_BROWSER_AGENT == MOZILLA
So I get this:
$font_size = 'medium';
$font_biggest = 'x-large';
$font_bigger = 'large';
$font_smaller = 'small';
$font_smallest = 'x-small';
Marc
Ok I see. I would even say that now we are using
text a bit smaller
than normal; for example, comparing the output of
<html><body><p>No tables found in
database.</p></body></html>
with what comes from PMA. But it's ok like this...
What browser/OS do you use? Well I'm more interested which branch of
PMA_setFontSizes you will get.
10:53 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: default font size
On Sat 29. 10. 2005 22:04, Marc Delisle wrote:
Currently I am on
PMA_USR_OS == Linux
PMA_USR_BROWSER_AGENT == MOZILLA
So I get this:
$font_size = 'medium';
$font_biggest = 'x-large';
$font_bigger = 'large';
$font_smaller = 'small';
$font_smallest = 'x-small';
And this is smaller than before? Well it shouldn't be, unless there is
something broken inside your browser :-).
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com
1 Nov
1 Nov
2:31 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: default font size
Michal Čihař a écrit :
On Sat 29. 10. 2005 22:04, Marc Delisle wrote:
It could be: I just checked again in Win2K /Firefox and with Original
theme I get the same font size, comparing 2.6.4 and 2.7.0.
Alexander, your tests are under Linux only?
Marc
Currently I am on
PMA_USR_OS == Linux
PMA_USR_BROWSER_AGENT == MOZILLA
So I get this:
$font_size = 'medium';
$font_biggest = 'x-large';
$font_bigger = 'large';
$font_smaller = 'small';
$font_smallest = 'x-small';
And this is smaller than before? Well it shouldn't be, unless there is
something broken inside your browser :-).
4 Nov
4 Nov
1:22 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: default font size
Marc Delisle a écrit :
Michal Čihař a écrit :
After a mail conversation with Sebastian, he pointed me to
PMA_setFontSize() and I just found that there is a difference between
PMA 2.6.4 and 2.7.0. This is a section from 2.7.0:
else if ((PMA_USR_OS == 'Mac'
&& ((PMA_USR_BROWSER_AGENT != 'IE' &&
PMA_USR_BROWSER_AGENT != '
MOZILLA')
|| PMA_USR_BROWSER_VER < 5))
|| PMA_USR_BROWSER_AGENT == 'KONQUEROR'
|| PMA_USR_BROWSER_AGENT == 'MOZILLA') {
and in 2.6.4, the last "OR" was not there.
|| PMA_USR_BROWSER_AGENT == 'MOZILLA') {
Do we really need this?
Marc
On Sat 29. 10. 2005 22:04, Marc Delisle wrote:
It could be: I just checked again in Win2K /Firefox and with Original
theme I get the same font size, comparing 2.6.4 and 2.7.0.
Alexander, your tests are under Linux only?
Marc
Currently I am on
PMA_USR_OS == Linux
PMA_USR_BROWSER_AGENT == MOZILLA
So I get this:
$font_size = 'medium';
$font_biggest = 'x-large';
$font_bigger = 'large';
$font_smaller = 'small';
$font_smallest = 'x-small';
And this is smaller than before? Well it shouldn't be, unless there is
something broken inside your browser :-).
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
Phpmyadmin-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
1 Nov
1 Nov
2:42 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: default font size
Michal Čihař a écrit :
On Sat 29. 10. 2005 22:04, Marc Delisle wrote:
I just checked again under Win2K /Firefox: no difference between 2.6.4
and 2.7.0!
Alexander, are you seeing this problem on Linux only?
Marc
Currently I am on
PMA_USR_OS == Linux
PMA_USR_BROWSER_AGENT == MOZILLA
So I get this:
$font_size = 'medium';
$font_biggest = 'x-large';
$font_bigger = 'large';
$font_smaller = 'small';
$font_smallest = 'x-small';
And this is smaller than before? Well it shouldn't be, unless there is
something broken inside your browser :-).
1:50 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michal & list,
I've sent a few screenshots to Sebastian because they did not make it to
the list. Please finde them here:
http://rabus.phpmyadmin.net/devel/interface-2.7/
Michal Čihař schrieb:
"Correct" means, that the font sizes should match relatively to each
other. But they don't always, as you can see on original-2.7.jpg.
So, I set the font sizes according to what I like them to be in PMA. And
the same thing for google... and for SourceForge... Hey, why don't I
just create different browser profiles, one for each website I'm going
to visit and for each web application I'm goint to use in my hole life...
I know, that I can tell my browser what font sizes to use, but I don't
see, why I suddeny have to - as the old values were always fine for
everyone.
Regards,
AMT
Yes, but with the same browser settings, the
default theme in 2.6.4
displayed a font size that was much smaller and "correct".
What is "correct" half of settings I have in browser? We were using small font size before, now it is
normal.
phpMyAdmin ist not a content management system. We do not display text
decoments, we display data, sometimes a lot of data.
For this purpose, we need to stick with small font sizes, imho.
In Firefox, I
have to hit ctrl/- twice to go back to the same size as
in 2.6.4.
Just set fonts you'd like to see in firefox. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDZ4B/8c/ssWf/SMcRAlgIAJsEB3HgybZzEPvc82cChFLTJ8MRqgCeNkR9
tgUmZ7yPjfP33wpJ3T4ksAg=
=QxD7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2 Nov
2 Nov
5:34 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Hi
On Tue 1. 11. 2005 15:49, Alexander M. Turek wrote:
I don't see any reason for this. I personally prefer font sizes I have
set in my browser as those are best readable for me.
So, I set the font sizes according to what I like them to be in PMA.
And the same thing for google... and for SourceForge... Hey, why
don't I just create different browser profiles, one for each website
I'm going to visit and for each web application I'm goint to use in
my hole life...
Do you really need different font size for each application?
I've sent a few screenshots to Sebastian because
they did not make it
to the list. Please finde them here:
http://rabus.phpmyadmin.net/devel/interface-2.7/
Oh, this is bad, I didn't notice such behaviour yet.
Michal Čihař schrieb:
"Correct" means, that the font sizes should match relatively to each
other. But they don't always, as you can see on original-2.7.jpg.
You're right at this point, some font sizes seem to be absolute what is
wrong.
Yes, but
with the same browser settings, the default theme in 2.6.4
displayed a font size that was much smaller and "correct".
What is "correct" half of settings I have in browser? We were using
small font size before, now it is normal.
phpMyAdmin ist not a content management system. We do not display
text decoments, we display data, sometimes a lot of data.
For this purpose, we need to stick with small font sizes, imho. In Firefox, I have to hit ctrl/- twice to go back to
the same size
as in 2.6.4.
Just set fonts you'd like to see in firefox. I know, that I can tell my browser what font sizes to
use, but I
don't see, why I suddeny have to - as the old values were always fine
for everyone.
You know everyone? :-)
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com
7:12 p.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Michal Čihař schrieb:
At least I did not notice any major complaints about our old font sizes.
Regards,
AMT
Do you really need different font size for each application?
Not yet, and I'd like to keep it that way. :-p
I know, that I
can tell my browser what font sizes to use, but I
don't see, why I suddeny have to - as the old values were always fine
for everyone.
You know everyone? :-) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDacZU8c/ssWf/SMcRAhcuAJ4q+wDgDVXJiAlG1nkgDPpoZ8yVgACgsq/I
TjYOgah7Tn79QufkcG6pV5w=
=qkYt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
9:46 p.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Hi Alex
On Thu 3. 11. 2005 09:12, Alexander M. Turek wrote:
At least I did not notice any major complaints about our old font
sizes.
I did notice some, however I don't dare to tell that everyone is going
to like any settings.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com
Hi there,
Michal Čihař schrieb:
But you said you need it. You want different font size for some CMS and
different for phpMyAdmin.
Do you really need different font size for each
application?
Not yet, and I'd like to keep it that way. :-p I know, that I can tell my browser what font sizes to
use, but I
don't see, why I suddeny have to - as the old values were always
fine for everyone.
You know everyone? :-)
7:52 p.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Alexander M. Turek wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michal & list,
I've sent a few screenshots to Sebastian because they did not make it to
the list. Please finde them here:
http://rabus.phpmyadmin.net/devel/interface-2.7/
pls check CVS
--
Sebastian Mendel
www.sebastianmendel.de
www.sf.net/projects/phpdatetime | www.sf.net/projects/phptimesheet
10:01 p.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Alexander M. Turek wrote:
So, I set the font sizes according to what I like them to be in PMA. And
the same thing for google... and for SourceForge... Hey, why don't I
just create different browser profiles, one for each website I'm going
to visit and for each web application I'm goint to use in my hole life...
no, web-sites/applications like sf, google, pma aso. should not set
generall font-size at all!
font size should be set by user in browser!
and by default this font-size is equal to system font size
so all this sites will display in the same font-size, with beeing the
same as like in your writer, mail app, fiel browser aso.
and than only on special places or special content will alter the
font-size, like h1 (120% or 1.2em or big)
or footnotes (0.8em or 75% or smallest)
--
Sebastian Mendel
www.sebastianmendel.de
www.sf.net/projects/phpdatetime | www.sf.net/projects/phptimesheet
In Firefox, I have to hit ctrl/- twice to go back to
the same size as
in 2.6.4.
Just set fonts you'd like to see in firefox.
4 Nov
4 Nov
11:29 p.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Michal Čihař a écrit :
On Sat 29. 10. 2005 16:02, Marc Delisle wrote:
Michal,
so, why are we setting font sizes in PMA_setFontSizes() at all?
Is it because some older browsers cannot change the font size?
Marc
Yes, but with the same browser settings, the
default theme in 2.6.4
displayed a font size that was much smaller and "correct".
What is "correct" half of settings I have in browser? We were using
small font size before, now it is normal.
In Firefox, I have to hit ctrl/- twice to go back
to the same size as
in 2.6.4.
Just set fonts you'd like to see in firefox.
6 Nov
6 Nov
7:14 p.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Marc Delisle wrote:
Michal Čihař a écrit :
i would also like to drop this
... at all, i would even drop setting font sizes in CSS, or at least set
it only once for body and eventually make the default h1, h2 a little
bit smaller - but not more!
f.e. setting the font sizes for select-tag to the same as in body-tag
has wired effects, by default font sizes in select, option, optgroup is
a little bit smaller than in parent element (body), this resulting in
different font sizes in a select box, as PMA only sets select and not
option, optgroup
--
Sebastian Mendel
www.sebastianmendel.de
www.sf.net/projects/phpdatetime | www.sf.net/projects/phptimesheet
On Sat 29. 10. 2005 16:02, Marc Delisle wrote:
Michal,
so, why are we setting font sizes in PMA_setFontSizes() at all?
Is it because some older browsers cannot change the font size? Yes, but with the same browser settings, the
default theme in 2.6.4
displayed a font size that was much smaller and "correct".
What is "correct" half of settings I have in browser? We were using
small font size before, now it is normal.
In Firefox, I have to hit ctrl/- twice to go back
to the same size as
in 2.6.4.
Just set fonts you'd like to see in firefox.
10 Nov
10 Nov
12:16 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Hi
On Mon 7. 11. 2005 09:27, Sebastian Mendel wrote:
i would also like to drop this
... at all, i would even drop setting font sizes in CSS, or at least
set it only once for body and eventually make the default h1, h2 a
little bit smaller - but not more!
I also do not see need to set font sizes ... anyway there is still some
bug in font sizes, see attached welcome message (darkblue/orange
theme).
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com
17 Nov
17 Nov
10:49 p.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Michal Čihař wrote:
Hi
On Mon 7. 11. 2005 09:27, Sebastian Mendel wrote:
pls check CVS
--
Sebastian Mendel
www.sebastianmendel.de
www.sf.net/projects/phpdatetime | www.sf.net/projects/phptimesheet
i would also like to drop this
... at all, i would even drop setting font sizes in CSS, or at least
set it only once for body and eventually make the default h1, h2 a
little bit smaller - but not more!
I also do not see need to set font sizes ... anyway there is still some
bug in font sizes, see attached welcome message (darkblue/orange
theme).
20 Nov
20 Nov
10:37 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Hi
On Fri 18. 11. 2005 12:50, Sebastian Mendel wrote:
Michal Čihař wrote:
Fix confirmed, thanks
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com
I also do not see need to set font sizes ...
anyway there is still
some bug in font sizes, see attached welcome message
(darkblue/orange theme).
pls check CVS
10 Nov
10 Nov
12:13 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Hi
On Sat 5. 11. 2005 13:28, Marc Delisle wrote:
so, why are we setting font sizes in
PMA_setFontSizes() at all?
Is it because some older browsers cannot change the font size?
AFAIK only some browsers have too big default fonts (eg. MSIE), that's
why this was requested. Then we ended with too many ifs for each
browser on the world...
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com
6:43 p.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Michal Čihař wrote:
Hi
On Sat 5. 11. 2005 13:28, Marc Delisle wrote:
i think we should drop all this, and leave this to the CSS in the themes.
--
Sebastian Mendel
www.sebastianmendel.de
www.sf.net/projects/phpdatetime | www.sf.net/projects/phptimesheet
so, why are we setting font sizes in
PMA_setFontSizes() at all?
Is it because some older browsers cannot change the font size?
AFAIK only some browsers have too big default fonts (eg. MSIE), that's
why this was requested. Then we ended with too many ifs for each
browser on the world...
10:23 p.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Hi
On Fri 11. 11. 2005 08:55, Sebastian Mendel wrote:
Michal Čihař wrote:
I agree, comments from others?
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com
Hi
On Sat 5. 11. 2005 13:28, Marc Delisle wrote:
i think we should drop all this, and leave this to the CSS in the
themes. so, why are we setting font sizes in
PMA_setFontSizes() at all?
Is it because some older browsers cannot change the font size?
AFAIK only some browsers have too big default fonts (eg. MSIE),
that's why this was requested. Then we ended with too many ifs for
each browser on the world...
11 Nov
11 Nov
12:23 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
On Fri 11. 11. 2005 08:55, Sebastian Mendel wrote:
Ok for me: after 2.7.0.
Marc
Michal Čihař wrote:
I agree, comments from others?
Hi
On Sat 5. 11. 2005 13:28, Marc Delisle wrote:
i think we should drop all this, and leave this to the CSS in the
themes. so, why are we setting font sizes in
PMA_setFontSizes() at all?
Is it because some older browsers cannot change the font size?
AFAIK only some browsers have too big default fonts (eg. MSIE),
that's why this was requested. Then we ended with too many ifs for
each browser on the world...
13 Nov
13 Nov
8:08 a.m.
New subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Catching up with you
Hi
On Fri 11. 11. 2005 14:23, Marc Delisle wrote:
Ok for me: after 2.7.0.
Created RFE #1356066 for remembering this.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com
6823
days inactive
6855
days old
32 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Alexander M. Turek -
Marc Delisle -
Marc Delisle
-
Michal Čihař -
Sebastian Mendel