On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 12:15:48PM +0200, Michal ?iha? wrote:
On 15.04.2003 12:11, Beck, Mike wrote:
i agree to adding any reserved words that are on
the mysql-website but not
in the list, but i wouldn't delete those that are in the list and not on the
web - that would mean that you can have a table named 'autocommit'?? even if
mysql does allow it, this can only mean trouble. Robin would your parser
mind that?
I don't see why we should have something different than MySQL does.
With
current version it has some bad side effects:
On MySQL commandline: "create table autocommit (i int);" goes okay, in
phpMyAdmin it is converted to "CREATE TABLE AUTOCOMMIT (i int)" so it
creates uppercased table. This is IMHO something we don't want...
If we wouldn't change case of reserved words, it would be okay, but we
do change this so we should have same reserved words as MySQL does.
Previously I have found that the website list is NOT up to date.
Instead I have based the list on the actual parser inside the MySQL
server (look in the yacc and flex files).
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2(a)orbis-terrarum.net
Home Page :
http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85