23 Feb
2002
23 Feb
'02
10:56 p.m.
Hi Oli!
well, if the field is not empty, what about ignoring
the
checkbox? This way the field would have priority over the
checkbox, and I would see it as quite logical... And you? :)
Well as I just tell you in my previous post ;), it seems to me neither
more, neither less logical since we can't know what is the last
user action.
Loïc
______________________________________________________________________________
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif
23 Feb
23 Feb
11:16 p.m.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:54:37AM +0100, Loïc wrote:
Well as I just tell you in my previous post ;), it
seems to me neither
more, neither less logical since we can't know what is the last
user action.
well:
if the user action was:
* typing in the field -> ignore the checkbox
* check to box without emptying the field -> no changes, user
should have deleted the contents too (logical?)
* emptying field and checkbox: set field = '' (empty, not NULL)
* emptying field and setting checkbox: set field = NULL
Olivier
--
_________________________________________________________________
Olivier Mueller - om(a)8304.ch - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland
qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch
24 Feb
24 Feb
12:51 a.m.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 11:15:21AM +0100, Olivier M. wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:54:37AM +0100, Loïc wrote:
ok
Well as I just tell you in my previous post ;),
it seems to me neither
more, neither less logical since we can't know what is the last
user action.
well:
if the user action was:
* typing in the field -> ignore the checkbox * check to box without emptying the field -> no
changes, user
should have deleted the contents too (logical?)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I'd like it another way.
Just checking the box and not having to empty the field is
IMHO much more handy.
* emptying field and checkbox: set field = ''
(empty, not NULL)
ok
* emptying field and setting checkbox: set field =
NULL
ok
:-)
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Yours sincerely
Wolfram Schlich; Berghof, D-56626 Andernach-Kell; +49-(0)2636-941194;
8232
days inactive
8232
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Loïc -
Olivier M. -
Wolfram Schlich