Hi,
I would like to educate myself about this subject :) I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but I just made a test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr"> <body> <p>Rename table to</p> </body> </html>
and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2. In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as in my test.
Why? Is my simple test flawed?
Marc
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
I would like to educate myself about this subject :) I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but I just made a test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr"> <body> <p>Rename table to</p> </body> </html>
and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2. In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as in my test.
'your' test is larger than in PMA and you have to reduce to 80% in PMA to get same size as in your test? how does this work?
Why? Is my simple test flawed?
i cannot see any difference
did you tried adding html {font-size: 100%;} ? what tells you page information about view mode? standard compliance both?
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
I would like to educate myself about this subject :) I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but I just made a test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr"> <body> <p>Rename table to</p> </body> </html>
and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2. In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as in my test.
'your' test is larger than in PMA and you have to reduce to 80% in PMA to get same size as in your test? how does this work?
Sorry, the text looks larger in PMA. In my test, it looks OK. It looks too large in PMA, as mentionned by Florian on the users list.
Why? Is my simple test flawed?
i cannot see any difference
Did you try my test page and compare it with PMA's output?
did you tried adding html {font-size: 100%;} ?
Sorry, I don't know where to add this. Modify the <html> tag?
what tells you page information about view mode? standard compliance both?
If I do right-click/page information, it says "mode de respect strict des standards" (strict standard mode).
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
I would like to educate myself about this subject :) I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but I just made a test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr"> <body> <p>Rename table to</p> </body> </html>
and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2. In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as in my test.
'your' test is larger than in PMA and you have to reduce to 80% in PMA to get same size as in your test? how does this work?
Sorry, the text looks larger in PMA. In my test, it looks OK. It looks too large in PMA, as mentionned by Florian on the users list.
Why? Is my simple test flawed?
i cannot see any difference
Did you try my test page and compare it with PMA's output?
yes, did you missed my attachments? (english your test page output, german original pma)
did you tried adding html {font-size: 100%;} ?
<html ...> <head> ... <style type="text/css"> html {font-size: 100%;} </style> </head> ...
you should also try to set the font to the same type as in pma
or just include the whole css from pma and cut out by trial and error all till it changes to what you see now
Sorry, I don't know where to add this. Modify the <html> tag?
what tells you page information about view mode? standard compliance both?
If I do right-click/page information, it says "mode de respect strict des standards" (strict standard mode).
yes, this is how it should be
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
I would like to educate myself about this subject :) I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but I just made a test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr"> <body> <p>Rename table to</p> </body> </html>
and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2. In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as in my test.
'your' test is larger than in PMA and you have to reduce to 80% in PMA to get same size as in your test? how does this work?
Sorry, the text looks larger in PMA. In my test, it looks OK. It looks too large in PMA, as mentionned by Florian on the users list.
Why? Is my simple test flawed?
i cannot see any difference
Did you try my test page and compare it with PMA's output?
yes, did you missed my attachments? (english your test page output, german original pma)
did you tried adding html {font-size: 100%;} ?
<html ...> <head> ... <style type="text/css"> html {font-size: 100%;} </style> </head> ...
you should also try to set the font to the same type as in pma
That's it! With this test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr"> <head> <style type="text/css"> html {font-size: 100%;} body {font-family: sans-serif;} </style> </head> <body> <p>Rename table to</p> </body> </html>
I see the same size for the text as in PMA (which still seems too big). In my browser, the default font is Times New Roman and the default size is 16.
I just made a quick test: in my browser, set the default size to 14. Now PMA 2.10.2 displays as the same size as PMA 2.6.0.
or just include the whole css from pma and cut out by trial and error all till it changes to what you see now
Sorry, I don't know where to add this. Modify the <html> tag?
what tells you page information about view mode? standard compliance both?
If I do right-click/page information, it says "mode de respect strict des standards" (strict standard mode).
yes, this is how it should be
Marc Delisle a écrit :
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
I would like to educate myself about this subject :) I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but I just made a test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr"> <body> <p>Rename table to</p> </body> </html>
and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2. In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as in my test.
'your' test is larger than in PMA and you have to reduce to 80% in PMA to get same size as in your test? how does this work?
Sorry, the text looks larger in PMA. In my test, it looks OK. It looks too large in PMA, as mentionned by Florian on the users list.
Why? Is my simple test flawed?
i cannot see any difference
Did you try my test page and compare it with PMA's output?
yes, did you missed my attachments? (english your test page output, german original pma)
did you tried adding html {font-size: 100%;} ?
<html ...> <head> ... <style type="text/css"> html {font-size: 100%;} </style> </head> ...
you should also try to set the font to the same type as in pma
That's it! With this test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr"> <head> <style type="text/css"> html {font-size: 100%;} body {font-family: sans-serif;} </style> </head> <body> <p>Rename table to</p> </body> </html>
I see the same size for the text as in PMA (which still seems too big). In my browser, the default font is Times New Roman and the default size is 16.
I just made a quick test: in my browser, set the default size to 14. Now PMA 2.10.2 displays as the same size as PMA 2.6.0.
I should say "as the same size as PMA 2.6.0 when my browser's default font size is 16".
or just include the whole css from pma and cut out by trial and error all till it changes to what you see now
Sorry, I don't know where to add this. Modify the <html> tag?
what tells you page information about view mode? standard compliance both?
If I do right-click/page information, it says "mode de respect strict des standards" (strict standard mode).
yes, this is how it should be
-
Marc Delisle -
Sebastian Mendel