19 Jul
2007
19 Jul
'07
11:14 a.m.
Hi,
I would like to educate myself about this subject :)
I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but
I just made a test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"
lang="en"
dir="ltr">
<body>
<p>Rename table to</p>
</body>
</html>
and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the
same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2.
In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as
in my test.
Why? Is my simple test flawed?
Marc
19 Jul
19 Jul
11:37 a.m.
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
I would like to educate myself about this subject :)
I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but
I just made a test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"
lang="en"
dir="ltr">
<body>
<p>Rename table to</p>
</body>
</html>
and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the
same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2.
In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as
in my test.
'your' test is larger than in PMA and you have to reduce to 80% in PMA to
get same size as in your test? how does this work?
Why? Is my simple test flawed?
i cannot see any difference
did you tried adding html {font-size: 100%;} ?
what tells you page information about view mode? standard compliance both?
--
Sebastian
12:03 p.m.
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Did you try my test page and compare it with PMA's output?
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sorry, the text looks larger in PMA. In my test, it looks OK. It looks
too large in PMA, as mentionned by Florian on the users list.
Hi,
I would like to educate myself about this subject :)
I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but
I just made a test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"
lang="en"
dir="ltr">
<body>
<p>Rename table to</p>
</body>
</html>
and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the
same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2.
In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as
in my test.
'your' test is larger than in PMA and you have to reduce to 80% in PMA to
get same size as in your test? how does this work? Why? Is my simple test flawed?
i cannot see any difference
did you tried adding html {font-size: 100%;} ?
Sorry, I don't know where to add this. Modify the <html> tag?
what tells you page information about view mode?
standard compliance both?
If I do right-click/page information, it says "mode de respect strict
des standards" (strict standard mode).
1:06 p.m.
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Did you try my test page and compare it with PMA's output?
yes, did you missed my attachments?
(english your test page output, german original pma)
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sorry, the text looks larger in PMA. In my test, it looks OK. It looks
too large in PMA, as mentionned by Florian on the users list.
Hi,
I would like to educate myself about this subject :)
I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but
I just made a test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"
lang="en"
dir="ltr">
<body>
<p>Rename table to</p>
</body>
</html>
and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the
same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2.
In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as
in my test.
'your' test is larger than in PMA and you have to reduce to
80% in PMA to
get same size as in your test? how does this work? Why? Is my simple test flawed?
i cannot
see any difference > did you tried adding html {font-size: 100%;} ?
<html ...>
<head>
...
<style type="text/css">
html {font-size: 100%;}
</style>
</head>
...
you should also try to set the font to the same type as in pma
or just include the whole css from pma and cut out by trial and error all
till it changes to what you see now
Sorry, I don't know where to add this. Modify the
<html> tag?
yes, this is how it should be
--
Sebastian
what tells you page information about view mode?
standard compliance both?
If I do right-click/page information, it says "mode de respect strict
des standards" (strict standard mode).
1:34 p.m.
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
That's it!
With this test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"
lang="en"
dir="ltr">
<head>
<style type="text/css">
html {font-size: 100%;}
body {font-family: sans-serif;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<p>Rename table to</p>
</body>
</html>
I see the same size for the text as in PMA (which still seems too big).
In my browser, the default font is Times New Roman and the default size
is 16.
I just made a quick test: in my browser, set the default size to 14. Now
PMA 2.10.2 displays as the same size as PMA 2.6.0.
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Did you try my test page
and compare it with PMA's output?
yes, did you missed my attachments?
(english your test page output, german original pma)
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sorry, the text looks larger in
PMA. In my test, it looks OK. It looks
too large in PMA, as mentionned by Florian on the users list.
Hi,
I would like to educate myself about this subject :)
I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but
I just made a test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"
lang="en"
dir="ltr">
<body>
<p>Rename table to</p>
</body>
</html>
and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the
same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2.
In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as
in my test.
'your' test is larger than in PMA and you have to reduce to
80% in PMA to
get same size as in your test? how does this work? Why? Is
my simple test flawed?
i cannot see any difference > did you tried adding html {font-size: 100%;}
?
<html ...>
<head>
...
<style type="text/css">
html {font-size: 100%;}
</style>
</head>
...
you should also try to set the font to the same type as in pma
or just include the whole css from pma and cut out by trial and error all
till it changes to what you see now
Sorry, I don't know where to add this. Modify
the <html> tag?
yes, this is how it should be
what tells you page information about view mode?
standard compliance both?
If I do right-click/page information, it says "mode
de respect strict
des standards" (strict standard mode).
1:52 p.m.
Marc Delisle a écrit :
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
I should say "as the same size as PMA 2.6.0 when my browser's default
font size is 16".
Marc Delisle schrieb:
That's it!
With this test:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"
lang="en"
dir="ltr">
<head>
<style type="text/css">
html {font-size: 100%;}
body {font-family: sans-serif;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<p>Rename table to</p>
</body>
</html>
I see the same size for the text as in PMA (which still seems too big).
In my browser, the default font is Times New Roman and the default size
is 16.
I just made a quick test: in my browser, set the default size to 14. Now
PMA 2.10.2 displays as the same size as PMA 2.6.0. Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
yes, did you missed my attachments?
(english your test page output, german original pma)
Marc Delisle schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to educate myself about this subject :)
> I know that we have decided to use the default browser's font size, but
> I just made a test:
>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"
lang="en"
> dir="ltr">
> <body>
> <p>Rename table to</p>
> </body>
> </html>
>
> and when I display that in FF 2.0.0.5, the text looks larger than the
> same text as seen on the Operations panel from PMA 2.10.2.
> In fact, I have to choose a font size of 80% to obtain the same size as
> in my test.
'your' test is larger than in PMA and you have to reduce to 80% in PMA to
get same size as in your test? how does this work?
Sorry, the text looks larger in
PMA. In my test, it looks OK. It looks
too large in PMA, as mentionned by Florian on the users list.
> Why? Is my simple test flawed?
i cannot see any difference
Did you try my test page and compare it with PMA's
output? > did you tried adding html {font-size: 100%;}
?
<html ...>
<head>
...
<style type="text/css">
html {font-size: 100%;}
</style>
</head>
...
you should also try to set the font to the same type as in pma
> or just include the whole css from pma and cut out by trial and error all
> till it changes to what you see now
>
>
>> Sorry, I don't know where to add this. Modify the <html> tag?
>>> what tells you page information about view mode? standard compliance both?
>> If I do right-click/page information, it says "mode de respect strict
>> des standards" (strict standard mode).
> yes, this is how it should be
6261
days inactive
6261
days old
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Marc Delisle -
Sebastian Mendel