17 Oct
2002
17 Oct
'02
12:28 p.m.
Hi,
As the branch 2.3.x has been out since two months, I propose to
remove the links to version 2.2.7 on phpmyadmin.net.
Marc
17 Oct
17 Oct
12:57 p.m.
Hi Marc & list,
As the branch 2.3.x has been out since two months, I
propose
to remove the links to version 2.2.7 on phpmyadmin.net.
I agree, phpMyAdmin 2.3.2 is stable enough imho.
Alexander
4:08 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:56:43PM +0200, Rabus wrote:
Hi Marc & list,
I would agree, however I was asked the other day about
upgrading.
Somebody needed to upgrade in a hurry, and they were having trouble with
the new config file in 2.3.2 (they had an old 2.2 before), so they ended
up sticking with 2.2.7 for the moment.
Perhaps we should provide it for a bit longer still?
Say till 2.3.4? (shoud be around two or three months away)
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2(a)orbis-terrarum.net
Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
As the branch 2.3.x has been out since two
months, I propose
to remove the links to version 2.2.7 on phpmyadmin.net.
I agree, phpMyAdmin 2.3.2
is stable enough imho.
5:06 p.m.
Robin Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:56:43PM +0200, Rabus
wrote:
On phpMyAdmin.net we have a link about "Older phpMyAdmin versions", isn't
that sufficient?
I just want to avoid too much publicity about 2.2.7, because, as you can see on a recent
bug report, people may be induced to think that 2.2.7 is more stable.
Marc
Hi Marc & list,
I would agree, however I was asked the other day about upgrading.
Somebody needed to upgrade in a hurry, and they were having trouble with
the new config file in 2.3.2 (they had an old 2.2 before), so they ended
up sticking with 2.2.7 for the moment.
Perhaps we should provide it for a bit longer still?
Say till 2.3.4? (shoud be around two or three months away)
As the branch 2.3.x has been out since two months,
I propose
to remove the links to version 2.2.7 on phpmyadmin.net.
I agree, phpMyAdmin 2.3.2 is stable enough imho.
5:26 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:05:04PM -0400, Marc Delisle wrote:
Yes, that should suffice.
Perhaps we
should provide it for a bit longer still?
Say till 2.3.4? (shoud be around two or three months away)
On phpMyAdmin.net we
have a link about "Older phpMyAdmin versions",
isn't that sufficient? I just want to avoid too much publicity about 2.2.7,
because, as you
can see on a recent bug report, people may be induced to think that
2.2.7 is more stable.
That sounds reasonable, lets go for it then.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2(a)orbis-terrarum.net
Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
5:11 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:56:43PM +0200, Rabus
wrote:
Did you tell them, that they can use their 2.2.7 config file with 2.3.x
because of my incredible backwards compatibility code? ;o)
Regards,
Alexander
Hi Marc & list,
I would agree, however I was asked the other day about
upgrading. Somebody needed to upgrade in a hurry, and they
were having trouble with the new config file in 2.3.2 (they
had an old 2.2 before), so they ended up sticking with 2.2.7 As the branch 2.3.x has been out since two
months, I propose
to remove the links to version 2.2.7 on phpmyadmin.net.
I agree, phpMyAdmin 2.3.2
is stable enough imho.
5:25 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:10:57PM +0200, Rabus wrote:
For some reason it
didn't work for them, and they were in an awful
hurry, so they just gave up on it and went to 2.2.7.
They were previously a client that I consulted for, but then they got
cheap and kept trying to get free service from me, which I wasn't going
to be party to.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2(a)orbis-terrarum.net
Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
I would agree,
however I was asked the other day about
upgrading. Somebody needed to upgrade in a hurry, and they
were having trouble with the new config file in 2.3.2 (they
had an old 2.2 before), so they ended up sticking with 2.2.7
Did you tell them,
that they can use their 2.2.7 config file with 2.3.x
because of my incredible backwards compatibility code? ;o)
8005
days inactive
8005
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Marc Delisle -
Rabus -
Robin Johnson