[Phpmyadmin-devel] gsoc branch
Hi, do we still need this branch? http://phpmyadmin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/phpmyadmin/branches/gsoc/ -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
Marc Delisle wrote:
Hi, do we still need this branch? http://phpmyadmin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/phpmyadmin/branches/gsoc/
I'm all for closing these branches. Big question is, are all usefull changes integrated in trunk? I had a quick look at these three, and they seem all merged. * tomas_zahra * tomas * zahra -- Met vriendelijke groet / Regards, Herman van Rink Initfour websolutions
Herman van Rink a écrit :
Marc Delisle wrote:
Hi, do we still need this branch? http://phpmyadmin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/phpmyadmin/branches/gsoc/
I'm all for closing these branches. Big question is, are all usefull changes integrated in trunk?
I had a quick look at these three, and they seem all merged. * tomas_zahra * tomas * zahra
I think that all useful code was merged in trunk. -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
Hi Dne Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:06:14 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
do we still need this branch? http://phpmyadmin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/phpmyadmin/branches/gsoc/
I think all of that should be merged back in trunk, however if somebody would want to see the history of the code, he would have to look into the gsoc branch. I'll ask different question: What advantages does bring deleting of old branches? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Dne Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:06:14 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
do we still need this branch? http://phpmyadmin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/phpmyadmin/branches/gsoc/
I think all of that should be merged back in trunk, however if somebody would want to see the history of the code, he would have to look into the gsoc branch.
I'll ask different question: What advantages does bring deleting of old branches?
Less space used on developers' workstations. I have tried to check out only selective portions of /branches but at some point I have problems and still have to check out the whole /branches. But you're right, I guess that seeing the history of this code is interesting. -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
Dne Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:27:15 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
Less space used on developers' workstations. I have tried to check out only selective portions of /branches but at some point I have problems and still have to check out the whole /branches.
Yes, svn sucks on this. I have been able to do selective checkout in past, but it was gradually converted to full checkout. Well I really do not care that it eats 3 GB of my diskspace, but I hate how slow it is... -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Dne Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:27:15 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
Less space used on developers' workstations. I have tried to check out only selective portions of /branches but at some point I have problems and still have to check out the whole /branches.
Yes, svn sucks on this. I have been able to do selective checkout in past, but it was gradually converted to full checkout.
Well I really do not care that it eats 3 GB of my diskspace, but I hate how slow it is...
At least I don't have to checkout /tags ! Do you? -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
Marc Delisle wrote:
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Dne Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:27:15 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
Less space used on developers' workstations. I have tried to check out only selective portions of /branches but at some point I have problems and still have to check out the whole /branches.
Yes, svn sucks on this. I have been able to do selective checkout in past, but it was gradually converted to full checkout.
Well I really do not care that it eats 3 GB of my diskspace, but I hate how slow it is...
The space no problem for me as well. As for the speed of updating, I usually update only in the trunk/phpMyAdmin or branch that I'll be working on. Still slow, but that's just source forge.
At least I don't have to checkout /tags ! Do you?
No. I have a full checkout of trunk and branches, and only a partial of tags. Therefore keeping the branches clean is very welcome. The whole gsoc branches folder could be moved to tags/gsoc2009 i guess. -- Met vriendelijke groet / Regards, Herman van Rink Initfour websolutions
Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:39:23 +0100 Herman van Rink <rink@initfour.nl> napsal(a):
I have a full checkout of trunk and branches, and only a partial of tags. Therefore keeping the branches clean is very welcome. The whole gsoc branches folder could be moved to tags/gsoc2009 i guess.
Yes, that makes sense, we should have done it from beginning... -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:39:23 +0100 Herman van Rink <rink@initfour.nl> napsal(a):
I have a full checkout of trunk and branches, and only a partial of tags. Therefore keeping the branches clean is very welcome. The whole gsoc branches folder could be moved to tags/gsoc2009 i guess.
Yes, that makes sense, we should have done it from beginning...
Well, in a sense, branches are supposed to be for active stuff, so during GSoC it made sense to have the code there, but now I agree with Herman's suggestion and I'll do the move. -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
participants (3)
-
Herman van Rink -
Marc Delisle -
Michal Čihař