10 Nov
2009
10 Nov
'09
8:06 a.m.
Hi,
do we still need this branch?
http://phpmyadmin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/phpmyadmin/branches/gsoc/
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info
10 Nov
10 Nov
10:59 a.m.
Marc Delisle wrote:
Hi,
do we still need this branch?
http://phpmyadmin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/phpmyadmin/branches/gsoc/
I'm all for closing these branches.
Big question is, are all usefull changes integrated in trunk?
I had a quick look at these three, and they seem all merged.
* tomas_zahra
* tomas
* zahra
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Regards,
Herman van Rink
Initfour websolutions
11:02 a.m.
Herman van Rink a écrit :
Marc Delisle wrote:
I think that all useful code was merged in trunk.
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info
Hi,
do we still need this branch?
http://phpmyadmin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/phpmyadmin/branches/gsoc/
I'm all for closing these branches.
Big question is, are all usefull changes integrated in trunk?
I had a quick look at these three, and they seem all merged.
* tomas_zahra
* tomas
* zahra 
12:23 p.m.
Hi
Dne Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:06:14 -0500
Marc Delisle <marc(a)infomarc.info> napsal(a):
do we still need this branch?
http://phpmyadmin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/phpmyadmin/branches/gsoc/
I think all of that should be merged back in trunk, however if somebody
would want to see the history of the code, he would have to look into
the gsoc branch.
I'll ask different question: What advantages does bring deleting of old
branches?
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
12:27 p.m.
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Dne Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:06:14 -0500
Marc Delisle <marc(a)infomarc.info> napsal(a):
Less space used on developers' workstations. I have tried to check out
only selective portions of /branches but at some point I have problems
and still have to check out the whole /branches.
But you're right, I guess that seeing the history of this code is
interesting.
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info
do we still need this branch?
http://phpmyadmin.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/phpmyadmin/branches/gsoc/
I think all of that should be merged back in trunk, however if somebody
would want to see the history of the code, he would have to look into
the gsoc branch.
I'll ask different question: What advantages does bring deleting of old
branches?
12:37 p.m.
Dne Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:27:15 -0500
Marc Delisle <marc(a)infomarc.info> napsal(a):
Less space used on developers' workstations. I
have tried to check out
only selective portions of /branches but at some point I have problems
and still have to check out the whole /branches.
Yes, svn sucks on this. I have been able to do selective checkout in
past, but it was gradually converted to full checkout.
Well I really do not care that it eats 3 GB of my diskspace, but I hate
how slow it is...
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
12:50 p.m.
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Dne Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:27:15 -0500
Marc Delisle <marc(a)infomarc.info> napsal(a):
At least I don't have to checkout /tags ! Do you?
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info
Less space used on developers' workstations.
I have tried to check out
only selective portions of /branches but at some point I have problems
and still have to check out the whole /branches.
Yes, svn sucks on this. I have been able to do selective checkout in
past, but it was gradually converted to full checkout.
Well I really do not care that it eats 3 GB of my diskspace, but I hate
how slow it is...
11 Nov
11 Nov
4:39 a.m.
Marc Delisle wrote:
Michal Čihař a écrit :
> Dne Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:27:15 -0500
> Marc Delisle <marc(a)infomarc.info> napsal(a):
>
>
>> Less space used on developers' workstations. I have tried to check out
>> only selective portions of /branches but at some point I have problems
>> and still have to check out the whole /branches.
>>
> Yes, svn sucks on this. I have been able to do selective checkout in
> past, but it was gradually converted to full checkout.
>
> Well I really do not care that it eats 3 GB of my diskspace, but I hate
> how slow it is...
>
The space no problem for me as well. As for the speed of updating, I
usually update only in the trunk/phpMyAdmin or branch that I'll be
working on. Still slow, but that's just source forge.
At least I don't have to checkout /tags ! Do you?
No.
I have a full checkout of trunk and branches, and only a partial of tags.
Therefore keeping the branches clean is very welcome. The whole gsoc
branches folder could be moved to tags/gsoc2009 i guess.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Regards,
Herman van Rink
Initfour websolutions
4:41 a.m.
Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:39:23 +0100
Herman van Rink <rink(a)initfour.nl> napsal(a):
I have a full checkout of trunk and branches, and only
a partial of tags.
Therefore keeping the branches clean is very welcome. The whole gsoc
branches folder could be moved to tags/gsoc2009 i guess.
Yes, that makes sense, we should have done it from beginning...
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
5:29 a.m.
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:39:23 +0100
Herman van Rink <rink(a)initfour.nl> napsal(a):
Well, in a sense, branches are supposed to be for active stuff, so
during GSoC it made sense to have the code there, but now I agree with
Herman's suggestion and I'll do the move.
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info
I have a full checkout of trunk and branches, and
only a partial of tags.
Therefore keeping the branches clean is very welcome. The whole gsoc
branches folder could be moved to tags/gsoc2009 i guess.
Yes, that makes sense, we should have done it from beginning...
5371
days inactive
5372
days old
9 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Herman van Rink -
Marc Delisle -
Michal Čihař