hi all, just needing your opinion again: there is a tool called docSQL http://sourceforge.net/projects/docsql/ which enables users to write columncomments and how the tables are connected and creates HTML - Lists of that. Actually having used that for some time had originally inspired me to do some work on the relationfeatures of PMA, now PMA is much more advanced here.
Now while i want to help a little with the Databasestructure of a groupware called phprojekt (www.phprojekt.com) i want to write some script to import the files that docSQL uses to save its data into our tables.
of course only a _VERY_ small part of our users will be interested in that, but some might. (at least the developer of docSQL is a PMA User as well *g*) Do you think i should just put this in the patch tracker and write something about it in Documentation.html so those few that need it can download it seperately or should i rather put it in CVS 'normally' and link to it from db_details_structure.php3?
Mike,
I think it's better to support it in cvs because eventually the patch tracker represents work to do for us :)
Marc
Beck, Mike wrote:
hi all, just needing your opinion again: there is a tool called docSQL http://sourceforge.net/projects/docsql/ which enables users to write columncomments and how the tables are connected and creates HTML - Lists of that. Actually having used that for some time had originally inspired me to do some work on the relationfeatures of PMA, now PMA is much more advanced here.
Now while i want to help a little with the Databasestructure of a groupware called phprojekt (www.phprojekt.com) i want to write some script to import the files that docSQL uses to save its data into our tables.
of course only a _VERY_ small part of our users will be interested in that, but some might. (at least the developer of docSQL is a PMA User as well *g*) Do you think i should just put this in the patch tracker and write something about it in Documentation.html so those few that need it can download it seperately or should i rather put it in CVS 'normally' and link to it from db_details_structure.php3?
Hi
IMHO maitaining code included in cvs is easier than maintaining separate patch, especially if need to modify some existing code. And for users it is definitely easier to use something prepared by someone else than looking for correct patch version and patching. Go ahead and give it in cvs ;-)
Michal
PS: I think that charset conversion I made is probably also used by very few people and it is already in cvs ;-).
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Beck, Mike wrote:
hi all, just needing your opinion again: there is a tool called docSQL http://sourceforge.net/projects/docsql/ which enables users to write columncomments and how the tables are connected and creates HTML - Lists of that. Actually having used that for some time had originally inspired me to do some work on the relationfeatures of PMA, now PMA is much more advanced here.
Now while i want to help a little with the Databasestructure of a groupware called phprojekt (www.phprojekt.com) i want to write some script to import the files that docSQL uses to save its data into our tables.
of course only a _VERY_ small part of our users will be interested in that, but some might. (at least the developer of docSQL is a PMA User as well *g*) Do you think i should just put this in the patch tracker and write something about it in Documentation.html so those few that need it can download it seperately or should i rather put it in CVS 'normally' and link to it from db_details_structure.php3?
-- Mike Beck mikebeck@users.sourceforge.net
-
Beck, Mike -
Marc Delisle -
Michal Cihar