Hi all, Looking into the XML export functionality, some known issues (solved for SQL export) apply to XML export too : bug #3136658 : export functions/routines before tables [0] bug #3136655 : export view of view [1] bug #3076692 : events are not exported [2] At this moment these bugs cannot be reproduced because 'export schema structure' is not available as an option when exporting as xml, but before enabling and releasing (patch #3135414 [3] ) this, I think all the mentioned bugs should be solved, because it's not a good idea to introduce known bugs with a stable release. Now, as there is no real development branch at this moment, I was thinking it might be a good idea to create a separate branch for these related bugs, that can be merged into the QA_3_3/QA_3_4/master (or whichever branch is current then) once all the work is done. I know I can create a local development branch on my system, but then nobody else that would work on the same set of bugs, can keep current with development that was done. What do you think? BTW: I'm a bit inspired by a recent post of Linus about branching [4]. I realize this does not completely apply to what I'm suggesting here, but it got me thinking anyway. As I see it now, there is no real way of 'picking' features that go into a release, because everything is added to a development branch. Forgive me if I'm potentially overcomplicating things. ;) [0] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3136658&group_id=2… [1] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3136655&group_id=2… [2] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3076692&group_id=2… [3] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3135414&g… [4] http://codicesoftware.blogspot.com/2010/11/linus-on-branching.html Kind regards, Dieter