Hi, now that I use Firebug, I no longer feel the need of a nicely formatted HTML generated source. In trunk I suggest to remove the . "\n" and other special HTML indenting when we touch a script.
Marc
Marc Delisle wrote:
Hi, now that I use Firebug, I no longer feel the need of a nicely formatted HTML generated source. In trunk I suggest to remove the . "\n" and other special HTML indenting when we touch a script.
Marc
no need at all (IMHO)
cheers
Jürgen
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi, now that I use Firebug, I no longer feel the need of a nicely formatted HTML generated source. In trunk I suggest to remove the . "\n" and other special HTML indenting when we touch a script.
uh ... i am already doing this in most cases ... ;-)
at least the indention, and many but not all of the \n
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi, now that I use Firebug, I no longer feel the need of a nicely formatted HTML generated source. In trunk I suggest to remove the . "\n" and other special HTML indenting when we touch a script.
uh ... i am already doing this in most cases ... ;-)
at least the indention, and many but not all of the \n
Why not all? are some of them needed for what users see?
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi, now that I use Firebug, I no longer feel the need of a nicely formatted HTML generated source. In trunk I suggest to remove the . "\n" and other special HTML indenting when we touch a script.
uh ... i am already doing this in most cases ... ;-)
at least the indention, and many but not all of the \n
Why not all? are some of them needed for what users see?
i have no problem with removing all - this is just how i did till now
but if you do xhtml validator check you will get "error in line #", so it is not very helpful if there is only one line, thats why i had left some of the \n in there
-
Jürgen Wind -
Marc Delisle -
Sebastian Mendel