Hi,
I propose a freeze for 2.6.0-rc1 on Sunday, May 23rd.
Marc
Hi Marc!
I propose a freeze for 2.6.0-rc1 on Sunday, May 23rd.
Would that include working on the design? If yes, I'd like to vote against it because I wanted to have a look at it but won't have time to dedicate to until the middle of next week.
If we agree to work on the design after FF I'm +1 on the FF.
Regards, Garvin.
Garvin Hicking a écrit:
Hi Marc!
I propose a freeze for 2.6.0-rc1 on Sunday, May 23rd.
Would that include working on the design? If yes, I'd like to vote against it because I wanted to have a look at it but won't have time to dedicate to until the middle of next week.
If we agree to work on the design after FF I'm +1 on the FF.
Regards, Garvin.
Well, we must freeze the design also at some point. I think that the release candidate 1 should look like the real thing. After -rc1 we should do only bug fix on the 2.6.0 branch, and change the design again on HEAD for 2.6.1 ;)
No need to rush 2.6.0-rc1. We can delay it if you prefer.
Marc
On 17.05.2004 15:26 -0400, Marc Delisle wrote:
Garvin Hicking a écrit:
Hi Marc!
I propose a freeze for 2.6.0-rc1 on Sunday, May 23rd.
Would that include working on the design? If yes, I'd like to vote against it because I wanted to have a look at it but won't have time to dedicate to until the middle of next week.
If we agree to work on the design after FF I'm +1 on the FF.
Regards, Garvin.
Well, we must freeze the design also at some point. I think that the release candidate 1 should look like the real thing. After -rc1 we should do only bug fix on the 2.6.0 branch, and change the design again on HEAD for 2.6.1 ;)
No need to rush 2.6.0-rc1. We can delay it if you prefer.
I prefer finishing design changes and making rc1 after that.
-
Garvin Hicking -
Marc Delisle -
Marc Delisle
-
Michal Čihař