[Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: next version roadmap
Marc.Delisle at cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca
Tue Jan 24 07:41:03 CET 2006
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
> Marc Delisle schrieb:
>> Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
>>> Marc Delisle schrieb:
>>>> Michal Čihař a écrit :
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:15:12 -0500
>>>>> Marc Delisle <Marc.Delisle at cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca> wrote:
>>>>>> I think Sebastian's idea is to say that release 2.8.1 does not have
>>>>>> more features than 2.8.0, only bugfixes. Critical bugfixes can
>>>>>> still be named with -plX.
>>>>> Okay, this sounds reasonable for me. But maybe then we could abandon
>>>>> those -plX as it just complicates versioning scheme.
>>>> So it's time to clarify the branch names.
>>>> HEAD would contain the new features + obviously all the bug fixes.
>>>> RELEASE_2_8_0 would contain ... 2.8.0, what a surprise!
>>> - branch 2_8
>>> - branch 2_8_0 // * 2006-01-23 *
>>> release 2_8_0_0 // RC1
>>> release 2_8_0_1 // RC2
>>> release 2_8_0_2 // FINAL
>>> release 2_8_0_3 // very quick release (security fix, pl1)
>> I find this confusing. Are we talking only about CVS tags or also about
>> the naming of the downloadable files?
> i was mainly talking about the cvs tags/branches
Ok, then I agree with your suggestion.
>> I prefer if users clearly see what they download:
>> phpMyAdmin-220.127.116.11 (used to be 2.8.0-pl1)
> the downloads don't need the last version numbers
> 18.104.22.168 can named as 2.8-RC1 or 2.8.0 RC1 as download file name
> 22.214.171.124 can named as 2.8-pl1 if you _really_ want this plx
No, I don't really want to have the -plX suffix, but we will have to be
careful if the tags and release names do not match.
Michal suggested that a quick fix to 2.8.0 be named 126.96.36.199, I agree.
But the version having a 188.8.131.52 in the filename would have a 2_8_0_3
tag, because of the potential of two RCs and one final?
> 184.108.40.206 can named as 2.8.1
> 220.127.116.11 can named as 2.8.1-pl1
> i also often saw
> 2.7.9 as 2.8-RC1
> 18.104.22.168 as 2.8-RC2
> 2.8 as 2.8(-Final)
> normally the last (fourth) number is the build number,
>> So I don't like the idea of 22.214.171.124 being a final one. This said, I see
>> that MailScanner (http://mailscanner.info) are releasing their version
>> 4.49.7-1 as their stable version (maybe this is their patch level 1 for
>> the stable 4.49.7) but I don't like it. Maybe it's just me?
> the number after the - is the rpm paket version, not the app version
More information about the Developers