[Phpmyadmin-devel] Enum editor: JQuery UI vs. custom dialog

[Sonny Michaud]

Hey all,

Here is a speed comparison between a number of major js libraries, which
may aid in your decision:  http://mootools.net/slickspeed/

Also, you may want to weigh the pros and cons of the methodologies of
the different frameworks, e.g. jQuery keeps all its functionality
separated into a separate jQuery object and is therefore less likely to
interfere with other js, whereas Prototype prototypes onto the js object
classes directly.

On 03/05/2010 06:52 AM, Michael Keck wrote:
>
> Am 05.03.2010 10:55, schrieb Michal Čihař:
>   
>> Hi
>>
>> Dne Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:27:15 +0100
>> Michael Keck <sfnet at michaelkeck.de> napsal(a):
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> that's the point why I prefer jQuery.
>>> First building full functional a web app without any javascript.
>>> Then with jQuery add animations, effects, styles and behaviors
>>> to dom elements.
>>>     
>>>       
>> I don't think it's much different with mootools.
>>   
>>     
> I don't know mootools in details, but I think it's more a developer
> preference.
> Somebody likes mootools, other prototype, next ext.js and others jquery.
> But I guess with Marc, we should use one js-framework at the moment wich
> is the best for us at the moment.
>   
>>   
>>     
>>> Perhabs, we should use a template engine (like smarty), for
>>> seperating code and layout. Perhabs this would make adding
>>> styles and themes easier. Other point is, all things, that have
>>> not to do with core functions, could be add to the templates,
>>> like plugins, effects or javascripts. And with templates we are
>>> able to cache basics, like menus, help, forms etc. This would
>>> increase performance.
>>>     
>>>       
>> Yes, we already agreed some time ago that it would be great to use
>> templates, but it is quite a lot work which nobody did to far :-).
>>   
>>     
> I will try to do this with smarty. But you're right it's really quite a
> lot of work.
> It would be nice, to comment in the current development all html-outputs
> with a special comment to search for it.
> I'm working at the moment on a smarty port in a seperated development
> environment and it's really diffucult to get all html outputs by reading
> each
> script and code.
>
> Then it's possible to create with templates different pma environments:
> - with javascript
> - without javascript
> - for text browsers
> - for PDAs
> - etc.
>
> The other point with a template base soulution is, it doesn't really matter
> wich framework for javascript is used. Cause it's included in the templates.
>
> A other great thing is, other great oss projects are able to use our core
> functional in their own applications.
>
> Regards
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>   
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
> Phpmyadmin-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.phpmyadmin.net/pipermail/developers/attachments/20100305/8da420e7/attachment.html>