[Phpmyadmin-devel] Is PMA_STR_binarySearchInArr needed?

Rouslan Placella rouslan at placella.com
Wed Jun 8 16:38:02 CEST 2011


On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 10:26 +0100, Rouslan Placella wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 09:41 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > Dne Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:22:02 -0400
> > Marc Delisle <marc at infomarc.info> napsal(a):
> > 
> > > I tested on a 64-bit Linux machine (running as a VM under ESX 4.1) under 
> > > PHP 5.3.6-RC3 and got different results (for current master):
> > > 
> > > Binary search:    0.6088
> > > array_search:     2.0246
> > > isset:            0.0068
> > > array_key_exists: 0.0176
> > 
> > I get similar numbers as well:
> > 
> > Binary search:    0.6937
> > array_search:     3.393
> > isset:            0.0056
> > array_key_exists: 0.0228
> > 
> > What is also interesting is worst results achieved during search for all
> > words in the array:
> > 
> > Binary search:    1.3098
> > array_search:     4.0101
> > isset:            0.0333
> > array_key_exists: 0.0868
> > 
> > Both binary search and array_search give pretty inconsistent results.
> > 
> > For the flipped array you expect to call array_flip or change data
> > structure to already contain flipped array? I assume latter, because
> > otherwise overhead for flipping array would probably make results worse.
> 
> I think it doesn't matter if one calls array_flip or not as that
> function is implemented very efficiently in PHP and the time to execute
> it can be considered negligible.
> 
> Rouslan

Actually, I take that back, array_flip really sucks:

    Binary search:           0.4924
    array_search:            1.5532
    isset + array_flip:      4.6791
    isset on flipped array:  0.0043
    
Rouslan





More information about the Developers mailing list