[Phpmyadmin-devel] Animation in sliders
Marc Delisle
marc at infomarc.info
Tue Jun 21 18:51:46 CEST 2011
Piotr Przybylski a écrit :
> 2011/6/16 Marc Delisle <marc at infomarc.info>:
>> Piotr Przybylski a écrit :
>>> 2011/6/16 Rouslan Placella <rouslan at placella.com>:
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> I've added some animations to the routines functionalities in my branch
>>>> and I'm just looking for your opinions about this. A demo video is
>>>> available on my site [1]. Please let me know if you think that it's too
>>>> much eye-candy or if you think that it's OK. I didn't check this into my
>>>> repo yet and I'm keeping the code in my git-stash.
>>> Personally, I don't like the table jumping up and down. Moving objects
>>> attract attention, especially if a large part of the screen moves, and
>>> in this case it looks like an effect done because it can be done.
>>> Space above Routines table should expand / contract to proper height
>>> in one move - it it needs two, then the effect stops looking nice, it
>>> becomes annoying.
>>>
>>> If it can't be done, it would look nice with old content replaced by
>>> new with 0 opacity and using fade in to show it.
>>>
>>> (Note - I can be prejudiced, I hate collapsible options in PMA because
>>> the animation used there is just wrong imo)
>>>
>> Piotr,
>> feel free to suggest another animation.
>>
>
> After looking at it closely, I realized what bothers me in this case -
> 'clip' effect looks like two animations mixed up due to hidden panel
> being vertically centered - 'blind' and moving it at the same time,
> making it impossible to focus on what is being shown. Plain 'blind'
> would be the best, but is painfully slow due to reflows of all content
> below, so maybe a 'blind' that reserves space for box in the same way
> as 'clip' does (so that content below it is moved only once).
>
Piotr,
'slide' instead of 'clip' seems to work well.
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info
More information about the Developers
mailing list