[Phpmyadmin-devel] license for error reporting server

Mohamed Ashraf mohamed.ashraf.213 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 26 11:54:14 CEST 2013

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Dieter Adriaenssens
<dieter.adriaenssens at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/8/19 Mohamed Ashraf <mohamed.ashraf.213 at gmail.com>:
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Dieter Adriaenssens
>> <dieter.adriaenssens at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Mohamed,
>>> On the team meeting last week, we discussed the license under which
>>> the error reporting server will be published.
>>> Because it is based on cakePHP which is licensed under MIT 2.0, we
>>> decided to license our additions under MIT 2.0 as well. This way it
>>> will be easier to contribute any changes that might be useful for
>>> cakePHP upstream (if applicable).
>>> In order to keep track of who holds copyright on which files (cakePHP
>>> or phpMyAdmin), a copyright notice should be added to each file that
>>> was created for phpMyAdmin. For original cakePHP files that are
>>> modified, both copyright holders (cakePHP and phpMyAdmin) should be
>>> mentioned.
>>> Can you do the necessary changes?
>>> Thanks!
>>> --
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Dieter Adriaenssens
>> Hi Dieter,
>> so each and every file created should have a copyright notice. Does
>> that include generated files such as the schema or the migrations?
> I would say yes.
> If they are generated by a script, you can probably modify  this
> script to add the copyright notice to it.
The script is in either a cakephp file or a plugin file. I do not own
them. which would create two problems first should I also add our
copyrighted notice to these files as well. and the other thing is that
prevents us from updating cakephp or the plugins in the future since
we have changed their files or we would have to do the changes to
every update.

I recommend that we ignore generated files. I do not know what is the
use of copyrighting a generated file. we didn't create it. we ran a
command and it was created for us by the code that someone else wrote.
if anything they should own the copyright not us.
>> Also I would need the actual script you want to be included at the top
>> of the file be it ours or has joint authors.
> In case it is only us, use the same docblock as the one for the
> cakePHP files, but replace all cakePHP stuff with phpMyAdmin.
> fe.
> /**
>  * phpMyAdmin Error reporting server
>  * Copyright (c) phpMyAdmin project (http://www.phpmyadmin.net)
>  *
>  * Licensed under The MIT License
>  * For full copyright and license information, please see the LICENSE.txt
>  * Redistributions of files must retain the above copyright notice.
>  *
>  * @copyright     Copyright (c) phpMyAdmin project (http://www.phpmyadmin.net)
>  * @link            http://www.phpmyadmin.net
>  * @license       http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php MIT License
>  */
> (remove the since and package, because our fiels were not released as
> part of cakePHP)
> In case of modifications to a cakePHP file, add a copyright line for
> phpMyAdmin and the following notice :
> This file was originally released by cakePHP and modified by
> phpMyAdmin. You can check the commit log for changes to this file.
>> I am also assuming that this is a low priority task and would be done
>> in my down time since I donot think this is time sensitive. Once you
>> give me the actual copyright notice to include I will start adding
>> them to the necessary files as I go.
>> Also files that are created by Cakephp already have a copyright notice
>> should I remove it and replace it with ours that has both authors or
>> should I modify their copyright notice or should I place our copyright
>> notice after theirs.
> See above.
>> Furthermore as for the issue of empty but copyrighted files I have
>> here the original app controller file as supplied by cakephp [0] and
>> here the current state of the file [1]. should this file still be
>> under joint copyright. I think this is the only one which has changed
>> so radically but there are others that are empty but copyrighted
>> however I havent changed them yet
> If you didn't change them, leave them as they are.
> I would say that a file with only a class definition can hardly be
> considered as copyrightable material, so I'm inclined to say to
> replace the copyright notice with ours. But it doesn't hurt to just
> add our copyright and the notice I mentioned above.
>> [0] https://github.com/cakephp/cakephp/blob/master/app/Controller/AppController.php
>> [1] https://github.com/phpmyadmin/error-reporting-server/blob/master/app/Controller/AppController.php
> I hope this helps.
> --
> Kind regards,
> Dieter Adriaenssens
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
> AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
> analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
> Visit us today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
> Phpmyadmin-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel

Mohamed Ashraf

More information about the Developers mailing list