[Phpmyadmin-devel] Clarification on Design of PMA_RecentFavoriteTable Class
Edward Cheng
c4150221 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 18 02:56:31 CEST 2014
Hi, Chanaka Dharmarathna,
I'm sorry code I provided have problems,
see sample blow, I fixed them
<pre>
<?php
header("Content-type:text/plain");
class Sample
{
private $selfData;
private $selfType;
private static $_instance;
public static function getInstance($type)
{
if (is_null(self::$_instance)) {
self::$_instance[$type] = new Sample($type);
} else {
if (! array_key_exists($type, self::$_instance)) {
self::$_instance[$type] = new Sample($type);
}
}
return self::$_instance[$type];
}
public function __construct($type)
{
$this->selfType = $type;
}
public function setData($data)
{
$this->selfData = $data;
}
public function getData()
{
return $this->selfData;
}
}
Sample::getInstance('A')->setData('AData');
echo Sample::getInstance('A')->getData();
Sample::getInstance('B')->setData('BData');
echo Sample::getInstance('A')->getData();
echo Sample::getInstance('B')->getData();
</pre>
Results is "ADataADataBData", is that ok?
2014-04-18 1:01 GMT+08:00 Chanaka Dharmarathna <pe.chanaka.ck at gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Edward Cheng <c4150221 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I thought we have these code can avoid errors, in my new PR I improve it.
>> <pre>
>> /**
>> * Returns class instance.
>> *
>> * @param string $type the table type
>> *
>> * @return PMA_RecentFavoriteTable
>> */
>> public static function getInstance($type)
>> {
>> if (is_null(self::$_instance)) {
>> self::$_instance[$type] = new PMA_RecentFavoriteTable($type);
>> } else {
>> if (self::$_instance[$type]->table_type != $type) {
>> self::$_instance[$type] = new PMA_RecentFavoriteTable($type);
>> }
>> }
>> return self::$_instance[$type];
>> }
>> </pre>
>> Does my PR fix it?
>>
>> 2014-04-17 0:02 GMT+08:00 Chanaka Dharmarathna <pe.chanaka.ck at gmail.com>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > It seems like, the latest PMA_RecentFavoriteTable is trying to behave as
>> > singleton design pattern. Is that a requirement ? I mean is there any
>> > reason
>> > for making it singleton ? By the way, there is good possibility to
>> > create
>> > new instances again and again with current logic.
>> >
>> > And the class has $table_type instance variable and more. Isn't it risky
>> > behaviour to share a static instance throughout the web server, which
>> > has
>> > instance variable which used in functions of that instance ?
>> >
>
>
> Hi Edward,
>
> Your code does not avoid creating many instances. By the way, we better
> first clarify our self, the requirement. Any thoughts ?
>
> Regards !
> --
> Chanaka Dharmarathna
> http://chanakaindrajith.blogspot.com/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
> _______________________________________________
> Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
> Phpmyadmin-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
>
--
Edward Cheng
More information about the Developers
mailing list