[Phpmyadmin-devel] Simulate UPDATE query
Marc Delisle
marc at infomarc.info
Sat Jun 14 18:39:55 CEST 2014
Le 2014-06-14 12:05, Ashutosh Dhundhara a écrit :
> On Saturday, 14 June 2014 12:13 AM, Marc Delisle <marc at infomarc.info>
> wrote:
>
> Ashutosh Dhundhara a écrit :
>> Hi Marc, I think if we will not use "<> 'NEW_VALUE'" in SELECT
>> statement, then it will also return the rows which match the WHERE
>> clause but already have the corresponding column's value =
>> 'NEW_VALUE'. But the UPDATE statement won't count those rows in
>> affected rows where there is already value = 'NEW_VALUE'.
>>
>> Lets say:
>>
>> `table_1` +----+----------+ | id | value | +----+----------+ |
>> 10 | value_10 | | 20 | value_20 | +----+----------+
>>
>> UPDATE query: UPDATE table_1 SET value = 'value_10' WHERE id = 10;
>> Result: Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec) Rows matched: 1
>> Changed: 0 Warnings: 0
>>
>> SELECT query: SELECT * FROM table_1 WHERE id = 10; Result: 1 row
>> in set.
>>
>> But this query will yield same result: SELECT * FROM table_1 WHERE
>> id = 10 AND value <> 'value_10';
>>
>> Result: Empty set (0.00 sec)
>>
>> Please correct me if I am wrong.
>>
>> Regards, Ashutosh Dhundhara
>>
>
> Hi Ashutosh, (Please use bottom-posting on this list).
>
>
> I see what you mean. In your original question, do you have a problem
> only when UPDATE or SELECT statement involves two tables?
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> yes this problem arises when there is a JOIN or more than one table
> in UPDATE statement. I was wondering if we can tweak the SELECT
> statement to get the desired results.
Hi Ashutosh,
I have no solution for this; maybe this means that the simulation will
have to be offered only for one-table queries.
>
>>
>> On Friday, 13 June 2014 10:42 PM, Marc Delisle
>> <marc at infomarc.info> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Ashutosh Dhundhara a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi, I was working on RFE #861 (Simulate UPDATE query). Lets say
>>> I have two tables:
>>>
>>> `table_1` +----+----------+ | id | value | +----+----------+
>>> | 10 | value_10 | | 20 | value_20 | +----+----------+
>>>
>>> `table_2` +----+----------+ | id | value | +----+----------+
>>> | 10 | value_10 | | 20 | value_20 | +----+----------+
>>>
>>> UPDATE Query: UPDATE table_1, table_2 SET table_1.value =
>>> 'NEW_VALUE', table_2.value='NEW_VALUE' WHERE table_1.id > 10 AND
>>> table_2.id > 10;
>>>
>>> This will affect 2 rows.
>>>
>>> How to simulate this query using SELECT statement?
>>>
>>> I was trying:
>>>
>>> SELECT DISTINCT table_1.value, table_2.value FROM table_1,
>>> table_2 WHERE table_1.value <> 'NEW_VALUE' AND table_2.value <>
>>> 'NEW_VAUE' AND table_1.id > 10 AND table_2.id > 10;
>>>
>>>
>>> but this only returns 1 row. Can this be done in a single query
>>> only?
>>>
>>> Regards, Ashutosh Dhundhara
>>
>> Hi Ashutosh, any reason why in your SELECT statement, you are
>> using "<> 'NEW_VALUE'" but in your UPDATE statement, you are using
>> "='NEW_VALUE'" ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk
>> Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems
>> Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data.
>> Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data
>> Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________ Phpmyadmin-devel
>> mailing list Phpmyadmin-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
>
>
>
>
>
--
Marc Delisle | phpMyAdmin
More information about the Developers
mailing list