Michal Čihař a écrit:
Hi
On Monday 29 November 2004 12:08, Garvin Hicking wrote:
I'd vote for using the 4.1 internal structure, if available instead of our internal one. We'd need to abstract all calls to fetching comments to be replacable with a SQLquery to get column comments. There's much depending on column comments (like "show table aliases in left frame" option and embedding comments in SQL dump), so I don't think a user should be able to enter differing comments in our infrastructure or the MySQL one. I also don't think it's necessary to offer the user a switch to use either infrastructure.
Or does anyone think there'll be a need that a user wants to store his comments in PMA DB instead of MySQL 4.1?
I'd say same for relation stuff :-). Why do we provide both ways to define them?
Because AFAIK, foreign key constraints are only supported in InnoDB.
Marc