On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Marc Delisle <marc(a)infomarc.info
<mailto:marc@infomarc.info>> wrote:
Le 2011-04-03 07:43, Ammar Yasir a écrit :
Yes, probably or like collisions resolution in hashing. I'll
think on it
more.
I've submitted my proposal, hoping to get some feedback. Is it
okay if we
concentrate more on a stable,usable product than
implement many
advanced
functionality? Because here it seems to be the
case where we can
add a lot
of statistics into the system.
Choosing what is basic functionality and what is advanced, is open to
interpretation; a usability test with a group can tell you more.
I agree.
Also, in the proposal should we mention exact working of the zooming
tool? I'm thinking that the functionality is fairly clear and many of
available plugins could well be of use. So we can maybe use those (with
modifications to our needs) instead of coding everything from scratch.
It will also be good if the zooming tool is something like they have
used earlier e.g. like google maps zooming. User might find such system
more friendly.
I don't think that the proposal should go too deep into implementation
details.