On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Marc Delisle marc@infomarc.info wrote:
Le 2013-01-19 11:20, Madhura Jayaratne a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Rouslan Placella <rouslan@placella.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was thinking that it would be quite nice if the "groups" in the new sf tracker were reverse sorted. I mean, who cares about "2.11.9", it's not even supported, it should be bottom of the list. On the other hand, "latest_git" and "3.5.5" are the most likely candidates for a new bug and should be at the top of the list.
Is there someone we can ask to fix this?
Bye, Rouslan
On a related note, it would be nice to have a pre-set search with the
following criteria status : open or unread owner : none sorted by artifact number in desc order.
This should list the bugs that a developer can work on, in one click.
Madhura, what should be the name of this search?
I'm not really sure. "Fix me", may be?? :)