Hi all,
This is regarding the "Favorite tables" feature. As it can be seen from the past discussions that session storing in this case should be removed. So, I had a few questions : Should we disable this feature when there is no phpMyAdmin configuration storage ?
Or
We should keep this feature enabled whether phpMyAdmin configuration storage is available or not a) and if phpMyAdmin configuration storage is not available then : - keep on adding favorite tables to the list of tables in browser's local storage, if already present. - create a new list in local storage, if already not present.
b) and if phpMyAdmin configuration storage is available: - then synchronize the list of tables in browser's local storage with list available in PMA configuration storage.
Which one of these is preferred ?
Regards, Ashutosh Dhundhara
Ashutosh Dhundhara a écrit :
Hi all,
This is regarding the "Favorite tables" feature. As it can be seen from the past discussions that session storing in this case should be removed. So, I had a few questions : Should we disable this feature when there is no phpMyAdmin configuration storage ?
Or
We should keep this feature enabled whether phpMyAdmin configuration storage is available or not a) and if phpMyAdmin configuration storage is not available then :
- keep on adding favorite tables to the list of tables in browser's local storage, if already present.
- create a new list in local storage, if already not present.
b) and if phpMyAdmin configuration storage is available:
- then synchronize the list of tables in browser's local storage with list available in PMA configuration storage.
Which one of these is preferred ?
I am in favor of the choice below "Or", even if the local browser storage is less portable than the phpMyAdmin configuration storage (it's related to a specific browser, and sometimes to a specific workstation).