On 30-11-10 15:24, SourceForge.net wrote:
Patches item #3055886, was opened at 2010-08-30 10:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kai-schaetzl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377410&aid=3055886...
I think we could make this last suggestion happen, it makes sense.
What would be a sensible default ... 20? And would it not be confusing for users?
Herman van Rink a écrit :
On 30-11-10 15:24, SourceForge.net wrote:
Patches item #3055886, was opened at 2010-08-30 10:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kai-schaetzl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377410&aid=3055886...
I think we could make this last suggestion happen, it makes sense.
What would be a sensible default ... 20? And would it not be confusing for users?
Yes it makes sense.
I suggest to remove the true/false configuration on this one and just have a LeftDisplayTableFilterMinimum with a default of 30. If someone wants to disable he'll put 9999 or whatever in this parameter.
I don't think users would be confused because in 3.4 there is a nice label inside the drop-down, saying "filter tables by name".
Hi
Dne Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:38:58 -0500 Marc Delisle marc@infomarc.info napsal(a):
Herman van Rink a écrit :
On 30-11-10 15:24, SourceForge.net wrote:
Patches item #3055886, was opened at 2010-08-30 10:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kai-schaetzl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377410&aid=3055886...
I think we could make this last suggestion happen, it makes sense.
What would be a sensible default ... 20? And would it not be confusing for users?
Yes it makes sense.
I suggest to remove the true/false configuration on this one and just have a LeftDisplayTableFilterMinimum with a default of 30. If someone wants to disable he'll put 9999 or whatever in this parameter.
Agreed.