[Phpmyadmin-devel] Enum editor: JQuery UI vs. custom dialog

Marc Delisle marc at infomarc.info
Fri Mar 5 13:29:05 CET 2010


Michael Keck a écrit :
> 
> Am 05.03.2010 10:55, schrieb Michal Čihař:
>> Hi
>>
>> Dne Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:27:15 +0100
>> Michael Keck <sfnet at michaelkeck.de> napsal(a):
>>
>>   
>>> that's the point why I prefer jQuery.
>>> First building full functional a web app without any javascript.
>>> Then with jQuery add animations, effects, styles and behaviors
>>> to dom elements.
>>>     
>> I don't think it's much different with mootools.
>>   
> I don't know mootools in details, but I think it's more a developer
> preference.
> Somebody likes mootools, other prototype, next ext.js and others jquery.
> But I guess with Marc, we should use one js-framework at the moment wich
> is the best for us at the moment.
>>   
>>> Perhabs, we should use a template engine (like smarty), for
>>> seperating code and layout. Perhabs this would make adding
>>> styles and themes easier. Other point is, all things, that have
>>> not to do with core functions, could be add to the templates,
>>> like plugins, effects or javascripts. And with templates we are
>>> able to cache basics, like menus, help, forms etc. This would
>>> increase performance.
>>>     
>> Yes, we already agreed some time ago that it would be great to use
>> templates, but it is quite a lot work which nobody did to far :-).
>>   
> 
> I will try to do this with smarty. But you're right it's really quite a
> lot of work.
> It would be nice, to comment in the current development all html-outputs
> with a special comment to search for it.
> I'm working at the moment on a smarty port in a seperated development
> environment and it's really diffucult to get all html outputs by reading
> each
> script and code.

Please, have a look at http://nosmarty.net/


-- 
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info




More information about the Developers mailing list