[Phpmyadmin-devel] Prototype of new navigation

[Marc Delisle]

Aris Feryanto a écrit :
> On 20 Agu 2011, at 22:33, Rouslan Placella <rouslan at placella.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 09:49 -0400, Marc Delisle wrote:
>>> Rouslan Placella a écrit :
>>>> Hi there,
>>>> 
>>>> I've been working on a rewrite of the navigation frame and I've
>>>> pushed a prototype to my remote repo and it's available for
>>>> preview on my demo server [1]. It's still quite far from being
>>>> finished, there are several unimplemented features and bugs,
>>>> but you will get a general idea.
>>>> 
>>>> I would appreciate if you take the time to have a look at it
>>>> and give me some feedback regarding this. Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Rouslan
>>>> 
>>>> [1]: http://demo.phpmyadmin.net/gsoc-rouslan/
>>> Rouslan, impressive! I'm trying to run it on my machine but I
>>> cannot find this code in
>>> git://repo.or.cz/phpmyadmin/roccivic.git.
>> The code is in the 'rte' branch [1], but please keep in mind that
>> it's far from being ready, as I was rushing the development because
>> I wanted to have something almost-usable for the GSoC deadline. In
>> fact, it needs a lot of refactoring, cleaning, commenting,
>> optimising, the addition of missing features and some bugfixes.
>> 
>> [1]:
>> http://repo.or.cz/w/phpmyadmin/roccivic.git/shortlog/refs/heads/rte
>> 
>> 
>>> Suggestions: - show which db is active (because you may open more
>>> than one)
>> Noted, thanks.
>> 
>>> - the tree should not close after a table copy from Operations
>> Yeah, I need something better than refreshing the whole navigation
>> upon operations such as "new db", "new table", "copy", "rename",
>> etc....
>> 
> 
> The new navigation looks great!
> 
> Just an opinion. When expanding a database node, I found that it is
> easier if we can see the list of tables and views directly under the
> database node (in the same level with Functions, Triggers, etc.), so
> we don't need one more ajax request (either by clicking on "Tables"
> node or automatically expanded when only "Tables" node exist under
> the databse). Anyone have the same thought?

I think it's cleaner to regroup all tables under a "Tables" heading like
they are now, but automatic expansion of this Tables node would be an
improvement, because of its popularity.

-- 
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info