[Phpmyadmin-devel] Interested in GSOC project

[Akash Sinha]

# Yes i agree with removing frameset  idea ( the space in left is getting
useless,no use other than just displaying table name)  ..we never get a
complete page to administer a table .We should customize the header area to
fulfil the needs.

# And also there should be some history information of the queries should be
saved during an active session.

----
Akash Sinha

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:16 PM, 陈岳峰 <dennislyve at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have some ideas for the ajaxify work
>
> 1.A good framework.As the ajaxify of PMA just get started, I think it is
> essential to establish a scalable framework to process the ajax request as
> soon as possible.You can see the existed codes for ajaxify work have a lot
> in common, we should not repeat such codes again and again. The frame work
> should include not be limited to:
>
>   form validation(use JQuery validation plugin to replace current
> validation function)
>   basic function of request processing
>   handle with expired session
>   callback interfaces for overriding
>   UI design to display response information
>
> 2.Code refactor
> Now that we have introduced jquery to PMA, we should make full use of it
> and rewrite functions like getElementsByClassName,getElement(e,f).
> But on the other hand, we should not abuse JQuery. I see a lot
> $(document).ready(function() {
>  ...
> }
> in functions.js, as quoted from JQUERY's doc," In most cases, the script
> can be run as soon as the DOM hierarchy has been fully constructed", so all
> the ready function will be called when the dom's constructed. But
> functions.js is included in many pages, only a few of them need to run those
> ready function(actually one of it). We should split them into seve3.ral js
> file to be included only by pages that really need them.
>
> 3.No framesets anymore
> In web1.0, people use framesets to achieve some ajax-like function.Here in
> Web2.0, do we still need them?However, I guess this is a big project to
> rebuild a no-frame application, where scripts refactoration and layout
> adjustment are involved, but it worth a try.  I prefer to replace the
> navigation frame with a hidable side bar, this will reduce some layout
> adjustment work too.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dennis Chen
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Marc Delisle <marc at infomarc.info> wrote:
>
>> 陈岳峰 a écrit :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I guess this time I did pushed it
>>
>> Yes you did.
>>
>> --
>> Marc Delisle
>> http://infomarc.info
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
>> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
>> for your organization - today and in the future.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
>> _______________________________________________
>> Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
>> Phpmyadmin-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
> Phpmyadmin-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
>
>


-- 


http://web.iiit.ac.in/~akash.sinhaug08
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.phpmyadmin.net/pipermail/developers/attachments/20110318/f7a1e7d9/attachment.html>