[Phpmyadmin-devel] RFE #919
Marc Delisle
marc at infomarc.info
Fri Jul 25 16:38:14 CEST 2014
Le 2014-07-24 06:01, Ashutosh Dhundhara a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Marc Delisle <marc at infomarc.info
> <mailto:marc at infomarc.info>> wrote:
>
> Le 2014-07-23 22:39, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
> > 2014-07-23 20:22 GMT+02:00 Ashutosh Dhundhara
> > <ashutoshdhundhara at yahoo.com <mailto:ashutoshdhundhara at yahoo.com>
> <mailto:ashutoshdhundhara at yahoo.com
> <mailto:ashutoshdhundhara at yahoo.com>>>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is in regards with RFE #919
> > <http://sourceforge.net/p/phpmyadmin/feature-requests/919/>
> (Multiple-column
> > foreign key relation). I was trying to figure out the UI for
> this by
> > modifying the existing one. I have attached a screenshot for
> the same.
> > Please comment.
> >
> > --
> > Ashutosh Dhundhara
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is nice.
> > IMO the constraint name should be displayed as a title, and not
> > displayed in the bottom-right corner, so you will see it easily.
> > Maybe, you can reduce table rows height, by displaying the ON
> UPDATE and
> > DELETE on the same line.
> >
> > Hugues.
>
> Hi Ashutosh,
> somehow I missed your initial email but saw the screenshot in the
> archives.
>
> The UI you are proposing does not work, in my opinion. On the left side,
> you are proposing multiple columns, but the feature request is about
> having, on the left side, one column, and on the foreign key constraint
> side (right), multiple columns.
>
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> can you please quote an example of this case?
>
> Are you talking about a case like this:
>
> Lets say I have two tables `table_1` and `table_2` with two columns `id`
> and `value`.
> The query:
> ALTER TABLE `table_2` ADD FOREIGN KEY (`id`) REFERENCES `table_1` (`id`,
> `value`);
Hi Ashutosh,
yes, I was thinking about a case like this but I reverified in
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/create-table-foreign-keys.html
and it does not look to be possible.
So your UI is correct, in general, except that I suggest that instead of
numbering the relations (1, 2), you just use some visual divider like a
horizontal line. Numbering would introduce a doubt about the order of
the foreign keys, which does not exist (each FK is independent from the
others).
I have a few questions about your screenshot:
- Does it represent the case when a user is trying to add constraints to
table_2 ?
- Why did the user match table_1.value for the id column, and table_1.id
for the value column? Taking the MySQL manual as an example, it's much
easier to understand this:
FOREIGN KEY (product_category, product_id)
REFERENCES product(category, id)
--
Marc Delisle | phpMyAdmin
More information about the Developers
mailing list