Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:15:12 -0500 Marc Delisle Marc.Delisle@cegepsherbrooke.qc.ca wrote:
I think Sebastian's idea is to say that release 2.8.1 does not have more features than 2.8.0, only bugfixes. Critical bugfixes can still be named with -plX.
Okay, this sounds reasonable for me. But maybe then we could abandon those -plX as it just complicates versioning scheme.
So it's time to clarify the branch names.
HEAD would contain the new features + obviously all the bug fixes.
RELEASE_2_8_0 would contain ... 2.8.0, what a surprise!
HEAD
branch 2_8
branch 2_8_0 // * 2006-01-23 *
release 2_8_0_0 // RC1 release 2_8_0_1 // RC2 release 2_8_0_2 // FINAL release 2_8_0_3 // very quick release (security fix, pl1)
I find this confusing. Are we talking only about CVS tags or also about the naming of the downloadable files?
I prefer if users clearly see what they download: phpMyAdmin-2.8.0-rc1 phpMyAdmin-2.8.0 phpMyAdmin-2.8.0.1 (used to be 2.8.0-pl1)
So I don't like the idea of 2.8.0.2 being a final one. This said, I see that MailScanner (http://mailscanner.info) are releasing their version 4.49.7-1 as their stable version (maybe this is their patch level 1 for the stable 4.49.7) but I don't like it. Maybe it's just me?
Marc
branch 2_8_1 normal fix reales
release 2_8_1_0 // RC1 ?? release 2_8_1_1 // FINAL release 2_8_1_2 // very quick release (security fix, pl1)
...
branch 2_9 // * 2006-03-?? *
...
just like this one:
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roadmap/archives/2005_12.html
to keep it small, we have always only two branches open